Positive and Negative Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence and E-Healthy Diet Literacy Among Adults: A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling Study
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to examine the association between e-healthy diet literacy (e-HDL) and general attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) among adults. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 610 adults aged 19–64 years. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a questionnaire consisting of five sections, including sociodemographic characteristics, digital nutrition information practices, AI use in nutrition and dietetics, the e-Healthy Diet Literacy Questionnaire (e-HDLQ), and the General Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS). Descriptive statistics, validity and reliability analyses, correlation analyses, and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) were performed. Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05. Results: The mean age of the participants was 33.07 ± 11.36 years, and 50.8% were female. The measurement model demonstrated acceptable reliability and convergent validity. Structural model analysis showed that positive attitudes toward AI were positively associated with e-HDL (β = 0.243, p < 0.001), whereas negative attitudes toward AI were negatively associated with e-HDL (β = −0.232, p < 0.001). Among the e-HDLQ dimensions, the strongest loading was observed for finding e-healthy diet information (β = 0.844), followed by applying e-healthy diet information (β = 0.641), digital healthy eating literacy (β = 0.636), judging e-healthy diet information (β = 0.308), and understanding e-healthy diet information (β = 0.277). Together, positive and negative attitudes toward AI explained 12.2% of the variance in e-HDL (R2 = 0.122), indicating a modest explanatory contribution. Conclusions: Positive and negative attitudes toward AI were independently associated with e-HDL among adults. Although the explained variance was modest, AI attitudes may represent one of several factors associated with digital nutrition literacy, warranting further investigation in future studies.
The method, ECCOLA, is presented, which aims at making the high-level AI ethics principles more practical, making it possible for developers to more easily implement them in practice.
Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, P. Abrahamsson· EUROMICRO Conference on Soft...· 64 citations· ⚡6
The goal is to not only refine the accuracy of the LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education.
Z. Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami, Muhammad Waseem et al.· arXiv.org· 62 citations· ⚡3
The use of large language models to automatically improve the user story quality in Austrian Post Group IT agile teams is explored, with a reference model for an Autonomous LLM-based Agent System developed and implemented at the company.
Zheying Zhang, M. Rayhan, Tomas Herda et al.· International Conference on...· 48 citations· ⚡4
This paper introduces a novel multi-AI-agent system designed to fully automate SLRs, and demonstrates how it substantially reduces the time and effort traditionally required for SLRs while maintaining comprehensiveness and precision.
Abdul Malik Sami, Z. Rasheed, Kai-Kristian Kemell et al.· arXiv.org· 44 citations· ⚡2
The proposed LLM-based multi-agent system automates qualitative data analysis process, creating opportunities for researchers and practitioners, and future improvements focus on enhancing multilingual performance and integrating continuous expert feedback.
Z. Rasheed, Muhammad Waseem, Aakash Ahmad et al.· arXiv.org· 41 citations
AI is making software generation faster, but speed does not remove the need for expertise. As more work is delegated to AI, tacit knowledge may become one of the most important human advantages in software engineering. The post Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering appeared first on GPT-Lab.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 16, 2026
The “HardFlow” algorithm could help generative AI models produce high-quality outputs that obey strict requirements when “pretty close” doesn’t cut it.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.