Data Quality and ManagementTopic ModelingNatural Language Processing Techniques
Abstract
Knowledge graph entity alignment refers to the process of identifying and linking entities that refer to the same real‐world object from different knowledge graphs. Structural heterogeneity and scarcity of training data have always been two major challenges that impede entity alignment task. The advent of Large Language Models presents new avenues for entity knowledge completion and unsupervised EA, inspired by their extensive background knowledge and comprehensive capability to process semantic information. However, it is nontrivial to directly apply Large Language Models in addressing the aforementioned two challenges due to the following reasons: (1) it will blindly enrich entity knowledge in the absence of appropriate constraints; (2) as a probability based model, it could generate noisy labels that may mislead the alignment. To this end, this paper presents a novel unsupervised entity alignment framework, named LLM‐Align, to effectively leverage Large Language Models to precisely annotate entity pairs. First, Constrained Entity Information Enrichment (CIE) technique is devised, which employs attributes and relationships existing in the KGs to constrain the completion process, which alleviates structural heterogeneity between aligned entities. Subsequently, a Code‐formatted Prompt Template (CPT) module was designed to assist the Large Language Models in labelling entity pairs from candidates obtaining via both semantic and structural similarities. Ultimately, Combinatorial Optimization method based entity pair Refinement (COR) technique was conceived to further enhance the quality of the labelled entity pairs, which are used to train a base EA model. Extensive experiments on various benchmark datasets demonstrate the advantages of LLM‐Align.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.
P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al.· IEEE International Conferenc...· 110 citations· ⚡7
The results indicate that software developers are a slightly happy population, but the need for limiting the unhappiness of developers remains, and 219 factors representing causes of unhappiness while developing software are identified.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· International Conference on...· 84 citations· ⚡6
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 14, 2026
The “HardFlow” algorithm could help generative AI models produce high-quality outputs that obey strict requirements when “pretty close” doesn’t cut it.
AI may appear weightless, but every model depends on physical infrastructure. To understand responsible AI, we need to look beyond algorithms and consider the entire lifecycle of the hardware behind them. The post Responsible AI Must Consider Its Afterlife appeared first on GPT-Lab.