Skip to content

AgentCheck: A Reproduce-Intervene-Mitigate Workbench for LLM Agents over MCP

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.11098 · 2 citations · ⚡ 1 influential · 30 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

AgentCheck is presented, an open-source web workbench that turns an MCP server into an intervention surface that makes tool-using LLM failure modes reproducible, comparable, and verifiable before deployment.

Abstract

Tool-using LLM agents are mostly evaluated assuming all tools work. When a tool times out, returns a week-stale value, or has its description poisoned in deployment, the developer needs a controlled way to reproduce the failure, test a fix, and confirm the fix worked before deployment. We present AgentCheck, an open-source web workbench that turns an MCP server into an intervention surface. AgentCheck runs an agent against its real tools and records every tool response, then re-runs the agent with the response perturbed by a fault (12 types) injector. Matching tool calls are replayed from cache, and later tool calls go live after the agent diverges. This yields a reproduce-intervene-confirm loop: the developer toggles a mitigation, re-runs against the identical fault, and sees if the failure goes away. Scoring has two parts: deterministic pass/fail rules, plus an LLM judge for interpretive labels, validated against human annotations. Across five agents, the best passes 105/120 scenarios and the weakest only 77. The failures are usually silent, confident use of incorrect tool outputs rather than crashes. On the weakest agent, a retry mitigation raises success on timeout error faults from as few as 30% of cases to 100%, whereas stale-data faults remain near 3-4 of 10 regardless of the mitigation. AgentCheck makes these failure modes reproducible, comparable, and verifiable before deployment.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

When May an Agent Stop? Evidence-Carrying Termination for Tool-Using LLMs

Evidence-Carrying Termination (ECT): an agent may return COMPLETE only when a typed certificate binds every required answer claim to valid, in-scope trace evidence and a deterministic replay reconstructs the claimed value.

Jason Liu · 3 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

ToolRobustBench: Stage-Wise Perturbation Evaluation and Failure Diagnosis for Tool-Calling Agents

ToolRobustBench provides a deterministic and cascade-aware benchmark for diagnosing robustness beyond clean tool-calling accuracy, where a tool-calling agent is an LLM system that selects a tool, supplies structured arguments, and interprets its returned feedback.

YiShan Zheng, Yuan Wu, Yi Chang · 2 citations
Jul 2026

Tool-Making and Self-Evolving LLM Agents in Low-Latency Systems

The results show that agents that build and maintain their own tool libraries, a key element of self-evolving agents, can make industrial LLM systems faster, more reliable, and easier to operate.

Kalle Kujanpää, Ning Liu, S. Alam et al. · 3 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Agentao: A Policy-Governed Runtime Harness for Embeddable Tool-Using LLM Agents

Agentao is presented, a governed local-first runtime for tool-using LLM agents that separates model-generated action proposals from host-authorized execution through a layered architecture consisting of host-facing surfaces, a host contract, a runtime core, a permission-mediated tool system, and supporting subsystems f...

Bo Jin, Q. Jiao, Xin Tong · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.