Living-Harness is proposed, a self-evolving agent harness that converts each completed trajectory and its evaluator signals into posterior evidence for bounded harness updates, and supports retrieval-only reuse of the evolved harness state across model backbones.
Abstract
Large language model (LLM) agents may recover from a failure within an episode or after a retry, yet the same execution failure can recur in later tasks because post-episode feedback rarely revises the persistent harness that guides future interactions. Static harnesses improve reliability through fixed tools, context, memory, and workflow structures, but remain unchanged after deployment. We propose $\textbf{Living-Harness}$, a self-evolving agent harness that converts each completed trajectory and its evaluator signals into posterior evidence for bounded harness updates. Guided by a domain-level $\textbf{Evolution-SOP}$ ($\textbf{S}$tandard $\textbf{O}$perating $\textbf{P}$rocedure), Living-Harness extracts an episode abstraction and structured update evidence, and writes two complementary forms of procedural knowledge: episodic memory that records trigger conditions, failure patterns, and recovery actions, and a state graph that records state nodes, repair edges, and transition rules. The updated harness state is retrieved to guide future interactions, while tools and base context remain frozen, allowing procedural repairs to accumulate across evolution cycles. On eight interactive environments derived from $\tau^2$-Bench and MultiWOZ-2.4, Living-Harness improves average Pass@1 over the strongest interactive baseline by 10.07 and 9.91 percentage points, respectively, and supports retrieval-only reuse of the evolved harness state across model backbones. Our code will be made publicly available soon at https://github.com/anotherbricki/Living-Harness.
Low-friction, expressive membrane prevents harness failures from becoming model failures and pushes measurement toward the model's true maximal underlying capability, on Factorio, where refinement allows for continuous technology progression and dedicated subagents enable parallelized work.
Seth Karten, Alex L. Zhang, Kevin Thomas et al.· 16 citations· ⚡2
This paper presents StructAgent, a state-centered framework that introduces a unified state for maintaining compact, verifiable task progress and a structured workflow that regulates progress through verifier-backed state transitions and generalizes beyond desktop environments to Minecraft, demonstrating the generality...
Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly used for multi-step, stateful tool-use tasks, yet production reliability remains limited. Unlike static software repair, agent repair must recover dynamic trajectories whose early decisions can propagate into later errors and external state changes. Existing automatic...
Chenyu Zhao, Shenglin Zhang, Wenwei Gu et al.· 2 citations
This review connects ten historical cognitive architectures, eight language-agent runtime families, and forty-two mechanism-focused modern systems to contribute a distinctive-mechanism catalog, an auditable evidence-depth framework, and a falsifiable agenda for testing these bundles as composable runtime invariants.
It is argued that an agent system should maintain an explicit representation of how it fails, induced from its own behavior and reusable wherever failure feedback is needed, and AdaMAST builds this representation by converting a target system's traces into a compact, evidence-grounded failure taxonomy.
M. Cemri, Andrei Cojocaru, Melissa Z. Pan et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.