Skip to content
#explainable ai Open access

Artificial Ignorance: An Agnotological Framework for AI Bias, Opacity, Explainability, and Governance

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is generally analyzed in terms of its expanding capacity to generate, process, and organize knowledge. This paper proposes reversing that perspective by examining what AI systems do not know, cannot know, are prevented from knowing, or make increasingly difficult for human beings to know. Drawing on agnotology—the study of the social production and organization of ignorance—the paper introduces the concept of artificial ignorance as a framework for integrating problems usually treated separately, including data bias, algorithmic opacity, hallucination, explainability, information overload, and the exclusion of relevant knowledge from computational models. The central hypothesis is that AI does not simply reduce ignorance by increasing access to information. Rather, it transforms the mechanisms through which ignorance is produced, distributed, reproduced, and governed. Artificial ignorance is therefore defined not as the mere absence of information within an artificial system, but as a relational and sociotechnical phenomenon emerging from the interaction among datasets, models, infrastructures, institutional objectives, economic incentives, human decisions, and social environments. The paper proposes a two-level taxonomy. At the epistemological level, it distinguishes between what AI does not know, what it cannot know, what it is prevented from knowing, and what becomes unknown to humans as AI increasingly mediates cognition and social decision-making. At the operational level, it identifies factual or data-based ignorance, epistemic opacity, structural ignorance, methodological ignorance, information-overload ignorance, and deliberately produced or planned ignorance. This framework connects technical questions concerning bias, explainability, causal inference, and model limitations with broader issues of responsible AI and governance. The paper finally introduces the concept of AI-cracy to describe an emerging configuration of power in which the management of knowledge and ignorance is increasingly mediated by algorithmic systems. The democratic challenge posed by AI is consequently not only how to regulate what artificial systems know and do, but also how to identify, make visible, and govern the forms of ignorance they incorporate and produce.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Apr 2020

ECCOLA - a Method for Implementing Ethically Aligned AI Systems

The method, ECCOLA, is presented, which aims at making the high-level AI ethics principles more practical, making it possible for developers to more easily implement them in practice.

Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, P. Abrahamsson · 64 citations · ⚡6
#computer vision Review Apr 2024

AI-powered Code Review with LLMs: Early Results

The goal is to not only refine the accuracy of the LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education.

Z. Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami, Muhammad Waseem et al. · 62 citations · ⚡3
#computer vision Open access Mar 2024

LLM-based agents for automating the enhancement of user story quality: An early report

The use of large language models to automatically improve the user story quality in Austrian Post Group IT agile teams is explored, with a reference model for an Autonomous LLM-based Agent System developed and implemented at the company.

Zheying Zhang, M. Rayhan, Tomas Herda et al. · 48 citations · ⚡4
#computer vision Review Mar 2024

System for systematic literature review using multiple AI agents: Concept and an empirical evaluation

This paper introduces a novel multi-AI-agent system designed to fully automate SLRs, and demonstrates how it substantially reduces the time and effort traditionally required for SLRs while maintaining comprehensiveness and precision.

Abdul Malik Sami, Z. Rasheed, Kai-Kristian Kemell et al. · 44 citations · ⚡2
#computer vision Feb 2024

Can Large Language Models Serve as Data Analysts? A Multi-Agent Assisted Approach for Qualitative Data Analysis

The proposed LLM-based multi-agent system automates qualitative data analysis process, creating opportunities for researchers and practitioners, and future improvements focus on enhancing multilingual performance and integrating continuous expert feedback.

Z. Rasheed, Muhammad Waseem, Aakash Ahmad et al. · 41 citations
#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

The Key Concepts of Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

It is suggested that the focus on finding keywords is the first step in guiding and providing direction for future research in the AI ethics field.

Ville Vakkuri, P. Abrahamsson · 39 citations · ⚡2

Related blog posts

GPT-Lab Sep 17, 2026

Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering

AI is making software generation faster, but speed does not remove the need for expertise. As more work is delegated to AI, tacit knowledge may become one of the most important human advantages in software engineering. The post Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering appeared first on GPT-Lab.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 14, 2026

New method enables AI for safety-critical situations

The “HardFlow” algorithm could help generative AI models produce high-quality outputs that obey strict requirements when “pretty close” doesn’t cut it.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.