GDPevo is presented, an evolution-native benchmark grounded in GDP-related enterprise workflows, together with the fully automated data pipeline that generates it, and the best evolved agents remain far below the fully informed oracle ceiling, indicating that the self-evolution ability of current agents remains far from fully realized.
Abstract
Agent self-evolution updates an agent's persistent state from prior experience and reuses it to solve related tasks more effectively. Evaluating self-evolution is difficult: existing benchmarks provide limited coverage of economically valuable task domains, do not always design training and test tasks such that test-time gains can be attributed to training experience, and remain vulnerable to data contamination. We present GDPevo, an evolution-native benchmark grounded in GDP-related enterprise workflows, together with the fully automated data pipeline that generates it. Its core mechanism, rule hybridization, decomposes each enterprise workflow into atomic business rules, distributes subsets of these rules across training tasks, and recombines them in held-out test tasks so that test-time gains are attributable. GDPevo spans CRM, ERP, finance, healthcare, legal, and data-centric workflows. Its V1 release contains 120 tasks in 12 groups, with five training and five held-out test tasks per group. Full automation enables the pipeline to expand the suite to 240 tasks in 24 groups (V2) within two days, providing a practical response to contamination. Using GDPevo, we evaluate four agents, each comprising a harness and a model, under four supervision types. Self-evolution consistently improves held-out accuracy by up to 16.44 percentage points. But the best evolved agents remain far below the fully informed oracle ceiling of 91.6%, indicating that the self-evolution ability of current agents remains far from fully realized. We publicly release the pipeline, benchmark, and full evaluation results at https://github.com/Prism-Shadow/GDPevo.
Agents used over time encounter recurring professional work: each case requires different evidence and judgment, while the underlying workflow can be reused. Benchmarks built from independent tasks cannot reveal whether an agent turns earlier experience into better procedures for later cases. We introduce FinEvo-Bench,...
This work introduces FinCUABuildBench, a benchmark for evaluating financial CUA task construction, and introduces FinCUABuildAgent, a multi-agent system for automatically constructing dynamic financial CUA evaluation tasks.
Jing-Pu Yang, Feng-Xian Ji, Jinri Guo et al.· 0 citations
DuMateBench, a real-session benchmark reconstructed from anonymized and privacy-screened user sessions collected from a large-scale production agent platform, is introduced, showing that performance under environmental perturbations is jointly shaped by the capabilities of the LLM and the surrounding agent framework.
Zechun Niu, Yu-Kun Zhao, Jia-Xin Zhang et al.· 1 citation
BizSage is presented, a multi-agent framework combining corpus-level fine-grained retrieval with quality-driven self-evolution that paves the way for reliable research assistance in economics, business, and the broader social sciences.
Yu-He Wu, Guang-Yu Wang, Jia-Xin Liu et al.· 0 citations
XOps is proposed, a five-layer reference architecture integrating PlatformOps, DataOps, MLOps and AIOps beneath an Agentic Orchestration layer with Policy-as-Code governance, together with a continuous-time Markov chain model quantifying the availability effect of agent-driven remediation.
Mete Köse, E. Küçüksille· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
EnterpriseBench is introduced, a benchmark that evaluates LLM agents across this spectrum, from static question answering to dynamic decision-making, and shows that it provides a practical benchmark for evaluating LLM agents in realistic enterprise strategic reasoning and decision-making.
Min Yang, Yi-Chen Pan, Jing-Hua Piao et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.