Mar 2025· arXiv.org· Vol abs/2503.24377· 29 citations· 209 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This survey provides a comprehensive analysis of reasoning economy in both the post-training and test-time inference stages of LLMs, encompassing the cause of reasoning inefficiency, behavior analysis of different reasoning patterns, and potential solutions to achieve reasoning economy.
Abstract
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced their ability to perform complex reasoning tasks, transitioning from fast and intuitive thinking (System 1) to slow and deep reasoning (System 2). While System 2 reasoning improves task accuracy, it often incurs substantial computational costs due to its slow thinking nature and inefficient or unnecessary reasoning behaviors. In contrast, System 1 reasoning is computationally efficient but leads to suboptimal performance. Consequently, it is critical to balance the trade-off between performance (benefits) and computational costs (budgets), giving rise to the concept of reasoning economy. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive analysis of reasoning economy in both the post-training and test-time inference stages of LLMs, encompassing i) the cause of reasoning inefficiency, ii) behavior analysis of different reasoning patterns, and iii) potential solutions to achieve reasoning economy. By offering actionable insights and highlighting open challenges, we aim to shed light on strategies for improving the reasoning economy of LLMs, thereby serving as a valuable resource for advancing research in this evolving area. We also provide a public repository to continually track developments in this fast-evolving field.
State of Thought is proposed, a new reasoning paradigm that enables endogenous reasoning in LLMs, with the model's internal reasoning state governing how reasoning unfolds, and provides a generalizable and efficient alternative to existing test-time reasoning paradigms.
Z. Gong, Yi-Kun Hou, Zi-Hao Zeng et al.· 0 citations
It is argued that emergent reasoning in LLMs is a product of three factors: model size, prompting approach, and evaluation metric, and proposed implications for designing benchmarks and assessing capabilities are proposed.
N. Kuotsu· International Journal of Cre...· 0 citations
This work isolates abductive reasoning from deductive reasoning: unlike deductive tasks, its difficulty cannot be inferred from formal structure and offers no shortcuts a model could exploit to mimic effort without genuine search, providing firmer ground for empirical claims of shared effort.
This work proposes ChainPrune, a novel reasoning path semantic structural optimization method to efficiently and controllably synthesize self-generated high-quality training data and incorporates a DPO-based preference learning method combined with supervised loss, effectively mitigating false reward suppression.
Wei-Hang Pan, Zhengxu Yu, Yuxiang Zhang et al.· 2 citations
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated great potential in code reasoning tasks, but their reasoning processes lack reliable verification mechanisms, making it difficult to ensure logical correctness. The Tree of Thoughts (ToT) framework improves reasoning by exploring multiple paths and employing backtracking,...
Hao-Liang Cheng, En-Yi Tang, Shuo-Xiao Zhang et al.· Proceedings of the ACM on So...· 0 citations
Evaluated on two reasoning domains, math and multi-hop reasoning, across 1-8B models from different families, LoT consistently improves over KD and converges faster than staged curricula, highlighting the value of adaptive progression.
Ming-Hui Liu, Thomas Magelinski, De-Hao Yuan et al.· 0 citations