Skip to content

Can Activation Steering Capture Multidimensional Authorship Style?

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 32 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Aspect-Aware Activation Steering (A3S) improves authorship style transfer where it is genuinely multi-aspect, outperforms a trained baseline in preference evaluations on out-of-domain benchmarks, and keeps target-exemplar overlap consistently low.

Abstract

Activation steering has shown promise for controlling LLM generation along well-defined attributes, but it remains unclear whether it can handle the multidimensional and hard-to-define nature of authorship style. We ask whether structured contrastive prompting along rhetorically-motivated dimensions can construct rich style representations directly in activation space, bypassing the need for natural language style descriptors or dedicated training. We find that the resulting directions share a common authorship backbone while conflicting on aspect-specific residuals that carry genuine stylistic signal, explaining why naive aggregation fails. We operationalize this in Aspect-Aware Activation Steering (A3S), a training-free framework that merges per-aspect contrastive directions with interference-aware aggregation and tunes steering strength per instance. A3S improves authorship style transfer where it is genuinely multi-aspect, outperforms a trained baseline in preference evaluations on out-of-domain benchmarks, and keeps target-exemplar overlap consistently low.

View source

Similar papers

#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

HyperStyler: Low-resource Authorship Style Transfer via Context-aware Style Navigation and Hypernetworks

This work proposes HyperStyler, a novel architecture that decouples LAST into style selection and style realization, and demonstrates that HyperStyler consistently outperforms prior methods including LLM-based approaches and generalizes robustly across domains.

Jongkyung Shin, Minguk Jeon, Chanwoo Park et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

When Writing Style Drifts: Benchmarking Authorship Verification under Distribution Shifts in Genre, Time and the AI-Era

AVShift is introduced, the first German benchmark for systematically evaluating AV under multiple distribution shifts, and feature analysis reveals stylistic features that remain stable across genres, while their relative importance varies depending on the specific genre transition.

Lotta Kiefer, Brisca Balthes, Christoph Leiter et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Aggregation-Aware Synthetic Text Generation Against Authorship Re-Identification

Online users often release multiple texts under the same identity, giving attackers an author profile that can reveal more than any single text. Existing authorship obfuscation methods optimize privacy independently for each document, leaving them blind to cross-document correlations that make aggregation dangerous. We...

Qian Ma, A. Squicciarini, Sarah Rajtmajer · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Predicting Steering Vectors and Adapter Weights for Few-Shot Author-Style Transfer

Adapting large language models to an individual author's style from a few examples is challenging, and scientific writing sharpens the difficulty: formal conventions leave little surface variation, and authors write about their own topics, so extracted ``style''easily entangles with content. We study style-conditioned...

L. Popp, Danni Liu, Supriti Sinhamahapatra et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

AuthBench: A Large-Scale Multilingual Benchmark for Authorship Representation across Genres and Lengths

AuthBench is introduced, a large-scale multilingual benchmark for authorship representation that is designed to make this evaluation broad, standardized, and realistic, and position it not only as a new benchmark, but as a diagnostic resource for studying when and why authorship representations succeed or fail.

Mao-Xun Huang, Zhen-Xing Zhang, C. Cardie · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

LLM-assisted writing and citation advantage: evidence from scientific publications before and after ChatGPT release

Analysis of a large-scale dataset covering 234,073 research papers published between 2019 and 2025 suggests that AI-assisted writing confers a modest but systematic advantage in visibility and discoverability that translates into higher measured impact.

S. Paklina, P. Parshakov, Elena Rapoport · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.