The benchmarking results provide an overview of the strengths and limitations of current models in addressing veterinary clinical queries and highlight the need for more effective adaptation methods to develop clinically reliable AI systems for veterinary care.
Abstract
We introduce PetQA, a Korean long-form question-answering (QA) benchmark for evaluating veterinary knowledge and clinical reasoning in large language models (LLMs) and large vision-language models (LVLMs). PetQA contains 10,076 text-only and 8,751 multimodal QA pairs derived from real-world questions about dogs and cats, paired with answers from expert veterinarians. Its test split, PetQA-Bench, further includes annotations for question types and clinical conditions. We evaluate eighteen models using ROUGE, BERTScore, and LLM-as-a-judge metrics for factuality and helpfulness under three settings: zero-shot inference, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and supervised fine-tuning (SFT). The benchmarking results provide an overview of the strengths and limitations of current models in addressing veterinary clinical queries and highlight the need for more effective adaptation methods to develop clinically reliable AI systems for veterinary care. To facilitate broader use, we additionally provide translated versions of PetQA-Bench in five languages.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial capabilities in natural language processing, yet their adaptation to specialized domains such as veterinary medicine and livestock production remains comparatively underexplored. This study adapted LLaMA-2-7B to the veterinary and livestock domain using a domai...
Tolgahan Ozturk, M. E. Yüksel, Selçuk Sevgen· Applied Sciences· 0 citations
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly evaluated for clinical question-answering (QA) tasks, yet benchmark accuracy alone provides limited assurance of clinical reliability. Existing evaluation metrics often fail to capture whether model reasoning preserves patient-specific context and diagnostic intent, while m...
Yi Liu, V. B. Kolachalama· PLOS Digital Health· 0 citations
MMTClinic is presented, a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) on complex reasoning and question-answering tasks involving clinical time-series and reveals notable differences in model performance across tasks, languages, and modalities, highlighting current limitations in clinical reasoning capa...
Sourav Malakar, Harshit Nigam, Akash Ghosh et al.· 0 citations
A comprehensive survey of various benchmark datasets used in medical LLM tasks, focusing on various aspects of medical knowledge such as electronic health records, doctor–patient dialogues, medical question answering, and medical image captioning, is presented.
L. K. Yan, Qian Niu, Ming Li et al.· Medicine Advances· 34 citations· ⚡1
The results identify a substantial domain gap between veterinary and human pathology, expose the risk of over-diagnosis of normal tissue in frontier models, and show that domain-specific training remains critical for visually grounded predictions.
Luca L. Weishaupt, S. de Brot, Javier Asin et al.· 0 citations