Skip to content

GUT: Quantifying and Optimizing the Reasoning Uncertainty of LLMs via Graph Complexity

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 56 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The key idea of GUT is to characterize the potential branches of each reasoning chain with a directed acyclic graph, thereby ensuring that all potential branches are comprehensively covered within the graph space.

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed great advances in the reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, the reasoning processes of LLMs often exhibit uncertainty, where LLMs often produce a proliferation of divergent branches at each reasoning step even when fed the same prompting inputs, and certain branches exhibit evidently incredible, even nonsensical, reasoning chains and results. In this paper, we propose the Graph-complexity-based UncerTainty (GUT) method for investigating the reasoning uncertainty of LLMs. The key idea of GUT is to characterize the potential branches of each reasoning chain with a directed acyclic graph, thereby ensuring that all potential branches are comprehensively covered within the graph space. Building upon this recognition, we further build two modules of GUT, that is, a Quantification (GUT-Q) module and an Optimization (GUT-O) module, for quantifying and reducing the reasoning uncertainty of LLMs, respectively. GUT-Q measures LLM reasoning uncertainty by approximating the reasoning space complexity with graph complexity. GUT-O implements uncertainty optimization by treating negative uncertainty as the reward function in reinforcement learning. Experimental results conducted on four LLMs and five datasets validate the effectiveness of GUT.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Probability is Not Enough: Exploring and Counting Divergent Tokens for Reasoning Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs

DTC is introduced, a framework that estimates confidence by counting tokens at which two models strongly disagree during decoding, and finds that their count is almost negatively associated with answer accuracy, thereby serving as a simple yet effective signal for uncertainty quantification.

Fei-Yang Li, Sheng-Jing Liu, Qi Zhan et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Interpreting Reasoning of Large Language Models via Partial Information Decomposition

Large reasoning models (LRMs) have achieved substantial improvements in solving complex mathematical problems, but often produce lengthy, repetitive, or erroneous reasoning trajectories. In this work, we introduce a new interpretability framework, SLIDER, to evaluate the quality of the reasoning process. SLIDER leverag...

Barproda Halder, Qiu-Yi Zhang, Sanghamitra Dutta · 0 citations
2026

Reasoning Graph-Structured Question Answering: Datasets and Insights from LLM Benchmarking

GRS-QA is introduced, a reasoning graph-structured question answering dataset that augments multi-hop QA instances from exisiting datasets, with directed reasoning graphs representing intermediate inference steps, and highlights the importance of unified structural annotations for understanding and improving multi-hop...

Khin S. Yone, Devasha Trivedi, Anish Pahilajani et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

GTA: Graph Theory Agent and Benchmark for Algorithmic Graph Reasoning with LLMs

The Graph Theory Agent (GTA), which pairs a preference-trained representation selector with plan-and-decompose scaffolding around a frozen executor LLM, is proposed, which lifts Phi-4 from 53.5% to 69.1% on the benchmark's easy split and from 33.0% to 41.5% on its hard split.

Zi-Xiang Xu, Yan-Bo Wang, Chenxi Wang et al. · 4 citations · ⚡1

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.