This paper presents a comprehensive survey of recent developments that integrate commonsense knowledge into computer vision tasks, systematically review approaches based on knowledge graphs, scene graphs, neuro-symbolic models, and commonsense-augmented transformers.
Abstract
Commonsense reasoning in computer vision encompasses integrating visual data and contextual knowledge, crucial for enhancing AI's understanding of everyday scenarios. This understanding not only improves machine learning models but also enhances their ability to interact meaningfully with humans and the environment. Unlike CNN-based conventional vision models, which are designed to identify objects within a specific image, incorporating commonsense knowledge enables models to interpret scenes in a more holistic manner, thereby improving their spatial ability to reason about relationships among objects and actions. This integration not only enhances object recognition but also facilitates a deeper understanding of the contextual factors, ultimately leading to more precise predictions and interactions in real-world applications. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of recent developments that integrate commonsense knowledge into computer vision tasks. We systematically review approaches based on knowledge graphs, scene graphs, neuro-symbolic models, and commonsense-augmented transformers. We also outline current limitations related to dataset bias, knowledge incompleteness, and integration challenges. Finally, we highlight prospective research trajectories in cross-modal reasoning, scalable commonsense knowledge injection, and neuro-symbolic hybrid architectures to develop truly intelligent visual systems.
Overall, Neural -Symbolic AI shifts computer vision from pure perception toward structured understanding and reasoning, although problems remain in scalable reasoning, knowledge integration, and real-world deployment.
Across six diverse visual reasoning tasks including multi-view spatial reasoning and collision prediction, ReImaGin consistently outperforms both text-only reasoning and specialist vision-tool baselines, with gains of up to 25\%, demonstrating the advantage of flexible, generative visual reasoning.
Nishad Singhi, H. P. Rodriguez, Aditya Arora et al.· 0 citations
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have made remarkable progress across visual perception tasks, yet spatial reasoning remains a persistent weakness, especially for questions that require reasoning over visual space. Recent spatial-reasoning methods incorporate generated grounding, where models predict bounding boxes...
Rafi Ibn Sultan, Xiang-Yu Zhou, Mohammad O. S. Chowdhury et al.· 0 citations
Existing spatial reasoning benchmarks mainly test spatial perception: reading off relations already visible in the input. Yet real-world spatial intelligence demands predictive spatial reasoning: constructing a scene from observations, anticipating how an intervention changes it, and reasoning about the unseen outcome....
Hong-Xing Li, Jin-Yue Su, Ding-Ming Li et al.· 0 citations
Vision-language-action models benefit from the understanding and reasoning capabilities of pretrained vision-language models, but action-only supervision provides limited grounding in world dynamics. Conversely, world-action models inherit spatiotemporal priors from video generation models, yet remain limited in semant...
Wen-Xuan Song, Jia-Yi Chen, Jing-Bo Wang et al.· 4 citations· ⚡1