Skip to content

Solving Hard XAI Queries Based on a Compiled Dual-Rail Encoding

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 32 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

It is proved in this paper that several classes of abductive explanations, remain hard to compute even for Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams, one of the most tractable subsets of the knowledge compilation map.

Abstract

The widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) within real-world applications has raised a lot of concerns regarding their trustworthiness, especially in critical applications. The field of eXplainable AI (XAI) has emerged with the objective of providing explanations to the users about the decisions made by AI systems. Several explanations for boolean classifiers have been introduced in the literature, including abductive and contrastive explanations, each giving a different insight on the decision of the classifier. However, computing an explanation for a decision of a boolean classifier is a hard problem in general. One way to deal with this complexity is to rely on a compiled representation of the classifier for which each explanation can be computed efficiently. Unfortunately, we prove in this paper that several classes of abductive explanations, remain hard to compute even for Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams, one of the most tractable subsets of the knowledge compilation map. Included in such classes are shorter abductive explanations or abductive explanations that include the explainee's preferences. To recover the benefits of working with compiled representations, we show that a proper representation of the dual-rail encoding of the classifier can be used to compute efficiently these classes of explanations.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

The Case for Automated Hyperspecialization: Evidence from SAT

This paper explores one such problem, SAT solving, by synthesizing hundreds of workload-specific SAT solvers at an average cost of $37 each, and conjecture that coding agents make automated hyperspecialization cheap, effective, and safe for problems with measurable performance and checkable output.

Harrison Green, Claire Le Goues, Fraser Brown · 0 citations
Conference Open access Sep 2026

Computing Coverage-Based Prime Implicant Explanations for Tree-Based Models

Coverage-based prime implicant explanations are formal explanations offering a number of valuable assets, especially in terms of faithfulness and generality. Unfortunately, deriving a coverage-based prime implicant explanation for an instance is computationally hard in the general case (the problem of identifying such...

G. Audemard, S. Coste-Marquis, Pierre Marquis et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Sep 2026

Abstracting the Indistinguishable in ASP

This work examines the computational complexity of existing abstraction techniques based on clustering (faithful and uniform abstractions) and proposes a novel syntactic operator to achieve uniform abstractions, when possible, and explores properties needed to reach abstractions from syntactic symmetry.

Z. G. Saribatur, Markus Hecher, J. Fichte · 1 citation
Review Open access Aug 2026

Beyond the Black Box—A New Vector for Explainable AI Through Comparative Analysis of Logical Systems

Modern AI often works as a “black box”: it gives an answer, but cannot show why. In high-stakes fields like law, medicine, and government—and under emerging rules such as the EU AI Act—that is a serious problem. Today’s most popular explainability tools, such as SHAP and LIME, only approximate a model’s reasoning after...

S. Gulyamov, S. Gulyamov, A. Rodionov et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.