It is proved in this paper that several classes of abductive explanations, remain hard to compute even for Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams, one of the most tractable subsets of the knowledge compilation map.
Abstract
The widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) within real-world applications has raised a lot of concerns regarding their trustworthiness, especially in critical applications. The field of eXplainable AI (XAI) has emerged with the objective of providing explanations to the users about the decisions made by AI systems. Several explanations for boolean classifiers have been introduced in the literature, including abductive and contrastive explanations, each giving a different insight on the decision of the classifier. However, computing an explanation for a decision of a boolean classifier is a hard problem in general. One way to deal with this complexity is to rely on a compiled representation of the classifier for which each explanation can be computed efficiently. Unfortunately, we prove in this paper that several classes of abductive explanations, remain hard to compute even for Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams, one of the most tractable subsets of the knowledge compilation map. Included in such classes are shorter abductive explanations or abductive explanations that include the explainee's preferences. To recover the benefits of working with compiled representations, we show that a proper representation of the dual-rail encoding of the classifier can be used to compute efficiently these classes of explanations.
This paper explores one such problem, SAT solving, by synthesizing hundreds of workload-specific SAT solvers at an average cost of $37 each, and conjecture that coding agents make automated hyperspecialization cheap, effective, and safe for problems with measurable performance and checkable output.
Harrison Green, Claire Le Goues, Fraser Brown· 0 citations
Coverage-based prime implicant explanations are formal explanations offering a number of valuable assets, especially in terms of faithfulness and generality. Unfortunately, deriving a coverage-based prime implicant explanation for an instance is computationally hard in the general case (the problem of identifying such...
G. Audemard, S. Coste-Marquis, Pierre Marquis et al.· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
This work examines the computational complexity of existing abstraction techniques based on clustering (faithful and uniform abstractions) and proposes a novel syntactic operator to achieve uniform abstractions, when possible, and explores properties needed to reach abstractions from syntactic symmetry.
Z. G. Saribatur, Markus Hecher, J. Fichte· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 1 citation
Modern AI often works as a “black box”: it gives an answer, but cannot show why. In high-stakes fields like law, medicine, and government—and under emerging rules such as the EU AI Act—that is a serious problem. Today’s most popular explainability tools, such as SHAP and LIME, only approximate a model’s reasoning after...
S. Gulyamov, S. Gulyamov, A. Rodionov et al.· Information· 0 citations
The results indicate how trustworthy LLM-generated explanations are in model-free settings, where the same LLMs are used but no oracle exists to verify them.
With $2.1 million funding from Google.org, the open-source Public Transit Intelligence Hub will unify public transit monitoring, operations, and passenger communication.