A deep learning method is proposed that takes an 11-dimensional vector comprising absolute magnitude, orbital parameters, and type information as input, and embeds the Bowell formula to fuse physical priors with data-driven modeling, thereby significantly expanding the training sample size, which ensures robust model generalization.
Abstract
Of nearly 1.5 million asteroids discovered to date, only about 5% have spectroscopic observations, resulting in limited physical property coverage. Multicolor photometry provides taxonomic classifications for the majority of asteroids. Meanwhile, asteroids originating from the same collisional event and occupying nearby regions of orbital space typically share similar surface properties. Consequently, orbital parameters can provide statistical constraints on asteroid type and albedo, enabling more reliable estimates of their sizes. To achieve accurate inversion of asteroid size and albedo using readily available information under optical observation and to improve the completeness of asteroid physical property databases, this paper proposes a deep learning method that takes an 11-dimensional vector comprising absolute magnitude, orbital parameters, and type information as input, and embeds the Bowell formula to fuse physical priors with data-driven modeling. The proposed method eliminates the dependence on spectral data, thereby significantly expanding the training sample size, which in turn ensures robust model generalization. Test results on asteroids explored by spacecraft or radar observations show mean absolute percentage errors of 26.4% and 21.6% for albedo and effective diameter, respectively. By applying the model to all asteroids with known types, a large-scale asteroid physical properties catalog was constructed. The resulting catalog contains taxonomic type, geometric albedo, and effective diameter for 188,737 asteroids. Compared to existing catalogs based on machine learning predictions, the sample coverage has improved by an order of magnitude. The generated catalog is available on Zenodo (doi:10.5281/zenodo.20032293).
A robust, interpretable, and physically consistent DL framework for reliable asteroid orbit classification in planetary defense applications is established using attention-driven Deep Learning and explainable techniques.
Md Readion Islam Razon, Md Amir Hamja, Md. Tanjim et al.· Experimental astronomy (Prin...· 0 citations
Accurate satellite tracking requires up-to-date Two-Line Elements (TLEs), as outdated data can lead to significant positioning errors. While ground-based optical telescopes are highly accessible, generating TLEs from their data is complicated by the fundamental lack of direct range measurements. This paper presents an...
Kamin Kanchanapradit, K. Noysena, R. Lipikorn· IEEE Access· 0 citations
This investigation further gauged the Beta-Variational Autoencoder's ability to locate anomalous surface features, successfully recovering two places of interest and numerous landed technological assets at a statistically significant rate.
Cameron Kelahan, D. Angerhausen, Adam Lesnikowski et al.· 0 citations
ADORA provides a flexible framework for studying astrometric extraction, calibration-bias diagnosis, and future SHERA requirements, and Pixel-position errors across the tested range remain near the matched-model recovery scale indicating robustness to certain detector calibration errors.
Dylan M. McKeithen, S. Shaklan, G. Vasisht et al.· Astronomical Telescopes + In...· 0 citations
Precise orbit determination of main-belt asteroids is essential for deep-space mission design, navigation, and target characterization. This study presents a refined orbit-determination analysis for 623 Chimaera and 269 Justitia, the two largest targets of the Emirates Mission to the Asteroid Belt (EMA). The dynamical...
R. Lu, Zimeng Li, Wanling Yang et al.· Frontiers in Astronomy and S...· 0 citations
This work presents an automated deep learning framework, LSBGPENet, for the robust estimation of structural and photometric parameters of LSBGs from wide-field imaging data and assesses the accuracy and reliability of the inferred parameters through comparisons with traditional profile-fitting measurements.