DCASE~2026 Task~5 introduces Audio-Dependent Question Answering (ADQA), which tests whether large audio-language models answer from the audio rather than from textual priors. An Audio-Dependency Filtering (ADF) pipeline combines silent-audio probing, per-option perplexity, a large language model (LLM) commonsense check, and human review to remove items solvable from text alone. The 3000 items that pass form the ADQA-Bench evaluation set, spanning music, speech, and environmental audio. The inaugural edition draws 14 teams and 36 submissions across two tracks defined by total parameter count (up to 100B and under 10B). A Chung-Ang University ensemble of MOSS-Audio-8B-Thinking and Qwen3-Omni-30B reaches the top overall accuracy at \pct{58.33}, and a MOSS-only configuration from the same team leads the sub-10B track at \pct{57.30}. Across the 30 submissions with a comparable development score, evaluation accuracy falls by 11.91 percentage points (pp) on average (median 10.91\,pp) on the hidden evaluation split, which is designed to be harder than the development split. The most common building blocks are: the MOSS-Audio-8B-Thinking backbone (13 of 36 submissions), Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning on AudioMCQ-StrongAC, and preference or reinforcement-learning objectives -- Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) in five teams, Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization (GDPO) in two. At test time, prompt engineering is near-universal, and majority or choice-permutation voting is common. Every system misses the same set of 233 evaluation items.
A structured Chain-of-Thought framework is introduced that decomposes the reasoning process into question analysis, question type, audio evidence, and reasoning, and how task-specific LoRA adaptation affects the two backbones is analyzed and inference-time rescaling of trained LoRA adapters is explored.
The resulting training-free pipeline, RECAST, consistently outperforms recent frame-selection baselines without modifying the ITM encoder, and preserves the per-frame matching cost of a standard single-query baseline.
S. Han, Thang Vu, Junyeong Kim· IEEE Access· 0 citations
FinMMEval 2026 Task 1 evaluates multilingual financial multiple-choice question answering in English, Chinese, Arabic, and Hindi. The task tests whether systems can select the correct answer to finance questions involving domain terminology, numerical interpretation, and conceptual financial reasoning across languages...
Zhuohan Xie, Yu-Yang Dai, R. Elbadry et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
Multilingual evaluations report accuracy at a single output-token cap, but languages need different numbers of tokens to express the same content, so the cap is a hidden experimental variable. We test whether the native-vs-translate gap on MGSM (German, Thai, Swahili) is a token-budget artifact for Qwen3-8B and Llama-3...
This work introduces audio multi-perspective clustering, where a model directly partitions speech recordings according to a natural-language perspective while inferring both the number of clusters and their assignments.
Wen-Jun Huang, Q. Chu, Tiger Shao et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.