Skip to content
Preprint

LegalPincite: Multi-level Legal Information Retrieval Dataset

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 39 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A large-scale legal IR dataset constructed from Court of Justice of the European Union judgments, which supports both the development and rigorous evaluation of legal IR methods, at multiple query-document levels (case-to-case, paragraph-to-case, and paragraph-to-paragraph retrieval).

Abstract

A common task in legal Information Retrieval (IR) is to find relevant legal sources from case-law collections. While legal practice often requires pinpoint citations (pincites) to specific case paragraphs, most existing public legal IR datasets lack paragraph-level citation annotations. Yet, publicly available datasets with such information contain data leakage in the query text and exclude paragraphs that are neither citing nor cited from the corpora, creating an unrealistic and oversimplified retrieval setting, potentially leading to inflated performance. To address these limitations, we contribute a large-scale legal IR dataset constructed from Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgments. The dataset contains: (i) masked case/paragraph queries, with removed citation information; (ii) a corpus that includes all paragraphs; and (iii) case- and paragraph-level ground truth citations, with partial human expert validation. Our dataset supports both the development and rigorous evaluation of legal IR methods, at multiple query-document levels (case-to-case, paragraph-to-case, and paragraph-to-paragraph retrieval). Link to dataset and code: https://huggingface.co/datasets/theresiavr/legalpincite

View source

Similar papers

#small language model Conference Open access Sep 2026

Improving legal reasoning reliability of large language models through citation resolution enhancements

This project seeks to create the infrastructure needed to make legal citation in OpenJustice rigorous and transparent through various enhancements to the extraction and connection of case metadata, and fully integrating the resulting citation graph into the reranker, maximizing LLM reasoning capabilities.

Aaron Elliott · 0 citations
Book Open access Aug 2021

VerbCL: A Dataset of Verbatim Quotes for Highlight Extraction in Case Law

Citing legal opinions is a key part of legal argumentation, an expert task that requires retrieval, extraction and summarization of information from court decisions. The identification of legally salient parts in an opinion for the purpose of citation may be seen as a domain-specific formulation of a highlight extracti...

Unknown authors · 3 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Insaafai: A Retrieval-Assisted Multilingual Legal Information and Document-Analysis Prototype for Indian Criminal Law

This study demonstrates the potential of retrieval-assisted AI to improve access to criminal-law information while Emphasizing the Importance of Authoritative Legal Sources, Expert Validation, Privacy Safeguards, and Human Oversight.

Siddhi Vishwakarma and Riddhi Vishwakarma · 0 citations
Book Open access Aug 2026

Engineering a Legal Corpus: A Lightweight and Transferable Pipeline for Building and Refining a Case-Law Corpus

A transferable pipeline producing a structured database covering most decisions since 2007 focusing on sexual orientation and gender identity asylum claims is designed, enabling the identification of structurally relevant decisions for qualitative analysis while producing data suitable for quantitative and computationa...

Mélanie Braillard, Hugo Hueber · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.