A large-scale legal IR dataset constructed from Court of Justice of the European Union judgments, which supports both the development and rigorous evaluation of legal IR methods, at multiple query-document levels (case-to-case, paragraph-to-case, and paragraph-to-paragraph retrieval).
Abstract
A common task in legal Information Retrieval (IR) is to find relevant legal sources from case-law collections. While legal practice often requires pinpoint citations (pincites) to specific case paragraphs, most existing public legal IR datasets lack paragraph-level citation annotations. Yet, publicly available datasets with such information contain data leakage in the query text and exclude paragraphs that are neither citing nor cited from the corpora, creating an unrealistic and oversimplified retrieval setting, potentially leading to inflated performance. To address these limitations, we contribute a large-scale legal IR dataset constructed from Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgments. The dataset contains: (i) masked case/paragraph queries, with removed citation information; (ii) a corpus that includes all paragraphs; and (iii) case- and paragraph-level ground truth citations, with partial human expert validation. Our dataset supports both the development and rigorous evaluation of legal IR methods, at multiple query-document levels (case-to-case, paragraph-to-case, and paragraph-to-paragraph retrieval). Link to dataset and code: https://huggingface.co/datasets/theresiavr/legalpincite
This project seeks to create the infrastructure needed to make legal citation in OpenJustice rigorous and transparent through various enhancements to the extraction and connection of case metadata, and fully integrating the resulting citation graph into the reranker, maximizing LLM reasoning capabilities.
Citing legal opinions is a key part of legal argumentation, an expert task that requires retrieval, extraction and summarization of information from court decisions. The identification of legally salient parts in an opinion for the purpose of citation may be seen as a domain-specific formulation of a highlight extracti...
Unknown authors· International Conference on...· 3 citations
This paper presents a new dataset that consists of the citation graph of court opinions, which cite previously published court opinions in support of their arguments, and focuses on the verbatim quotes, i.e., where the text of the original opinion is directly reused.
This study demonstrates the potential of retrieval-assisted AI to improve access to criminal-law information while Emphasizing the Importance of Authoritative Legal Sources, Expert Validation, Privacy Safeguards, and Human Oversight.
Siddhi Vishwakarma and Riddhi Vishwakarma· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
A transferable pipeline producing a structured database covering most decisions since 2007 focusing on sexual orientation and gender identity asylum claims is designed, enabling the identification of structurally relevant decisions for qualitative analysis while producing data suitable for quantitative and computationa...
Mélanie Braillard, Hugo Hueber· Proceedings of the 2026 ACM...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.