Skip to content
#software testing Open access

Decomposing U.S. Crude Death Rates, 2010-2024: Population Aging Dominates, and the Denominator Is Not Stable

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

A reproducible analysis of United States mortality, 2010-2024, making two contributions. The decomposition. The change in the crude death rate is split into an age-specific mortality component and a population age-structure component using the Kitagawa method. Over the full interval the age-structure component exceeds the entire observed rise in the crude rate, while age-specific mortality improved: the death rate went up over a period in which dying at a given age became less likely. Pandemic-era excess mortality is estimated against a baseline projected from the pre-pandemic trend in the age-adjusted rate rather than the raw count, and the age distribution of COVID-19 deaths is characterised. The denominator. Four vintage boundaries falling inside a single fifteen-year series are measured rather than assumed: the per-year vintage chain CDC WONDER carries, the Vintage 2024 restatement of 2023, the 2010 April 1 measurement basis, and the bridged-race to single-race seam at 2017/2018. The seam is exactly zero in every age band, in deaths and population alike, measured against a purpose-run export. The restatement is not: it accounts for roughly a quarter of the published 2023-to-2024 crude-rate decline, most of which books as a spurious improvement in age-specific mortality. NCHS has itself published two different crude death rates for 2020, in two of its own reports, naming denominator rebasing as the cause — which turns the argument that a crude rate is a claim about a denominator into a documented instance. Inputs are four committed CDC WONDER exports and three U.S. Census population vintages. Each export carries WONDER's own query-parameter footer and a SHA-256 that the test suite recomputes, so a reviewer receives the exact bytes the results were computed from rather than a description of a query to reconstruct. Every value in the manuscript is generated by the analysis code and substituted into a template; no number is typed into the prose. Three claims are kept separate and are not interchangeable. Provenance records where a value came from. Attestation records that a person checked it against that source, and no automated path in this repository can write it. Corroboration records that a separate publication reports the same figure, and is deliberately partial: 14 of 15 annual totals are corroborated against NCHS's published NVSR reports, 2023 on the death count only, and 2024 has no published source at all. A blank corroboration field means not corroborated, never that corroboration failed. Stated limits. The NVSR corroboration is not independent confirmation: NVSR and WONDER are both NCHS products drawing on the same mortality file and the same Census-derived denominators, so agreement shows the query returned what NCHS published, not that NCHS is correct. Age groups are collapsed to six rather than the NCHS eleven, so age-adjusted rates here are not comparable to NCHS's published figures. Licensing is split, because one licence covering all three components would have to be wrong about at least one. Software (src/, tests/, bootstrap scripts, notebooks) is BSD-3-Clause. The manuscript, figures and results.json are CC BY 4.0. The raw federal data is not licensed, because it is not the author's to license: U.S. federal government works are in the public domain under 17 U.S.C. § 105. The record below lists BSD-3-Clause because this is a software deposit; see LICENSE, paper/LICENSE and DATA.md in the repository for the full statement. AI assistance. This work was produced with AI assistance (Anthropic's Claude, via Claude Code), including the analysis software, its tests and documentation, and drafting of the manuscript. The author directed the work, verified every data value against the CDC WONDER export it was taken from, and is solely responsible for the analysis, its interpretation and its conclusions. No AI system meets authorship criteria and none is listed as a creator. See the repository README for the full disclosure.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Review Mar 2008

Agile methods in European embedded software development organisations: a survey on the actual use and usefulness of Extreme Programming and Scrum

The results show that the embedded industry has been able to apply agile methods in its development processes and that the appreciation of the agile methods and their individual practices appears to increase once adopted and applied in practice.

O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson · 238 citations · ⚡9
#computer vision Open access Jul 2017

What happens when software developers are (un)happy

Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.

D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 236 citations · ⚡13
#computer vision Open access Oct 2004

Mobile-D: an agile approach for mobile application development

The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.

P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al. · 225 citations · ⚡18

Related blog posts

GPT-Lab Sep 17, 2026

Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering

AI is making software generation faster, but speed does not remove the need for expertise. As more work is delegated to AI, tacit knowledge may become one of the most important human advantages in software engineering. The post Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering appeared first on GPT-Lab.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 17, 2026

Q&A: Rethinking how innovation happens

In his latest book, Professor Eugene Fitzgerald examines the forces that turn breakthroughs into value — and why innovation resists simple formulas.

Microsoft Research Blog Aug 12, 2026

MindTopo reveals VLMs’ spatial reasoning abilities

A path, a fence, a knot. MindTopo sets a new benchmark for testing how AI understands topological relationships and highlights new opportunities to strengthen spatial reasoning and planning. The post MindTopo reveals VLMs’ spatial reasoning abilities appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.