It is proposed that understanding and targeting epithelial–mesenchymal plasticity, rather than EMT alone, may provide a more effective framework for precision oncology and metastasis prevention.
Abstract
Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is increasingly recognized as a dynamic process of epithelial–mesenchymal plasticity (EMP) rather than a binary switch between epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes. This plasticity enables tumor cells to acquire invasive, metastatic, stem‐like, and therapy‐resistant characteristics that contribute to cancer progression and poor clinical outcomes. Despite extensive investigation, significant challenges remain in understanding the functional significance of partial EMT states, identifying robust biomarkers that capture EMT heterogeneity, and translating EMT‐targeted interventions into clinical practice. This review critically examines the molecular mechanisms governing EMT, including transcriptional regulators, signaling pathways, epigenetic modifications, and tumor microenvironmental influences. Particular emphasis is placed on hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal states, which have emerged as key drivers of metastatic fitness and therapeutic resistance. We further evaluate established and emerging EMT biomarkers, including E‐cadherin, N‐cadherin, vimentin, circulating tumor cells, and exosome‐derived signatures, highlighting their opportunities and limitations in clinical applications. Finally, we discuss current therapeutic strategies targeting EMT‐associated pathways and explain why many promising preclinical approaches have faced translational barriers. By integrating mechanistic, biomarker, and therapeutic perspectives, this review proposes that understanding and targeting epithelial–mesenchymal plasticity, rather than EMT alone, may provide a more effective framework for precision oncology and metastasis prevention.
It is argued that metastatic competence, therapy resistance, and immune evasion can be viewed as functional outputs of remembered plasticity rather than solely as consequences of a contemporaneous mesenchymal phenotype, positioning memory-bearing states as an important target for future therapeutic strategies.
Dominika Denisz, Magdalena Fabian, Jan Olszewski et al.· Cellular Oncology· 0 citations
Tumor plasticity and microenvironmental heterogeneity are established as an integrated, evolving system that fuels metastasis and limits durable treatment responses.
G. Dagar, M. Dagar, Ashna Gupta et al.· MedComm· 0 citations
By integrating diverse mesenchymal transition processes under a unified conceptual framework, this review positions mesenchymal drift as a unifying axis of stromal-immune reprogramming in prostate cancer and underscores its significance for next-generation therapeutic strategies.
Zijia Zhang, Feifan Liu, Shuze Liu et al.· iScience· 0 citations
Unraveling the intricate mechanisms of EMT activation in cancer will contribute to the advancement of personalized medicine and the design of more effective treatments against metastatic disease and pave the way for advancements in personalized medicine and improved treatment strategies for patients affected by EMT-rel...
Vafa Meftahpour, T. C. Dakal, Jarek Maciaczyk et al.· Signal Transduction and Targ...· 0 citations
The conceptual boundaries and operational criteria for identifying OnF in CRC are discussed, its regulatory mechanisms, plasticity-associated phenotypes, and translational relevance are examined, and the importance of distinguishing direct evidence of OnF from evidence of related plasticity mechanisms is emphasized.
Hao-Yu Wang, Song-Hao Liu, Ming-Xuan Zhang et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
The pivotal role of EMP in tumor metastasis and treatment resistance is elucidated and the clinical translational potential of targeting EMP-related signaling pathways as a personalized anti-metastasis therapeutic strategy is discussed.