This work expresses multi-output Gaussian process regression as a Forney-style factor graph in which a nearest-neighbor chain orders a fixed candidate set of inputs into a one-dimensional sequence, and compares the factor-graph formulation against an exact kernel-matrix baseline, a sparse-variational inducing-point baseline, and a nearest-neighbor baseline on a synthetic input-dimension sweep and on electricity time series forecasting.
Abstract
Multi-output Gaussian process regression scales cubically in the number of observations times outputs, and dense kernel-matrix methods need bespoke handling whenever different outputs are observed at different inputs. We express multi-output Gaussian process regression as a Forney-style factor graph in which a nearest-neighbor chain orders a fixed candidate set of $C$ inputs into a one-dimensional sequence. Along this chain, latent Mat\'ern processes evolve through linear-Gaussian transition factors, while the linear model of coregionalization mixes $L$ latent processes into $D$ outputs through a deterministic mixing factor and per-output scalar observation factors. Posterior computation reduces to exact Gaussian message passing on the chain at cost $\mathcal{O}(C(DL^2 + L^3))$ after chain construction, and missing observations omit their local factor without any covariance-matrix restructuring. The formulation therefore scales in the number of data samples and in the rate of missing observations, while remaining best suited to candidate sets in low input dimension. We compare the factor-graph formulation against an exact kernel-matrix baseline, a sparse-variational inducing-point baseline, and a nearest-neighbor baseline on a synthetic input-dimension sweep and on electricity time series forecasting. At low input dimension the factor-graph posterior tracks the exact kernel-matrix posterior closely, and the gap grows gradually as input dimension increases while staying competitive with both approximate baselines. On the electricity time series our factor-graph formulation matches all three baselines in forecast accuracy while scaling linearly in the number of data points, where the exact kernel-matrix method becomes infeasible and the inducing-point baseline remains substantially slower.
With the advance of measurement technologies and increasing computing power, large spatial data with heterogeneous structures are often collected over high-dimensional domains. Existing Gaussian process (GP) models and computational strategies are often inadequate for analyzing such datasets in multi-dimensional domain...
Theoretical scaling laws from linear regression to multiclass classification to multiclass classification are extended, while connecting to empirical scaling laws observed in large-scale neural networks.
Konstantinos Christopher Tsiolis, Denny Wu, Christos Thrampoulidis et al.· 0 citations
Gradient observations promise more accurate Gaussian process (GP) surrogates, but the cost of incorporating them has long stood in the way of realizing that promise. We propose a derivative GP with a budget of just two directions per observed gradient. One direction focuses on each gradient's direct contribution to tar...
This work proposes a regularized additive tensor autoregressive model with additive interaction of row-wise, column-wise and tube-wise temporal dependence that offers more interpretability, less computational burden due to its convex nature and estimation of the underlying low rank plus sparse pattern of its transition...
D. Ghosh, Nilanjana Chakraborty, S. Roy· 0 citations
Large spatial data sets now record many correlated variables at many thousands of locations, often on domains where Euclidean distance misrepresents proximity. The central difficulty is modelling the cross-variable dependence jointly while retaining variable-level interpretation. We introduce the bigraphical Mat'ern-Wh...
D. Dey, Alokesh Manna, Christopher J. Geoga· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.