Two-level phonology, elaborated by S. K. Shahumyan, was an early innovation in the phonological system, which was already rich in different conceptual approaches.
The following features are typical of two-level phonology:
1. The use of the hypothetical-deductive method as a general scientific basis, in contrast to other theories where the inductive method is used.
2. The use of the construct as the notion of scientific abstraction in phonemic analysis, and according to this, the differentiation between the two levels of abstraction — the stage of observation and that of constructs — in contrast with other phoneme theories characterized by a one-level approach.
3. The import of the concept of "linguistic behavior" as a means of phoneme distinction, in contrast with other theories, most of which (even those that prefer the formal side of the phoneme) to some extent take into consideration the meaning-differentiating factor when distinguishing between phonemes.
4. The wholeness: two-stage phonology includes both the segmental and suprasegmental levels of phonemic analysis.
6. (There was a numbering mistake in the original) The succession: the two-stage approach, which lies at the basis of the analysis, is used in succession when analyzing subphonemic, phonemic, and supraphonemic phenomena.
It should be considered that the vulnerable point of two-level phonology is the use of the notion of construct as a scientific abstraction applied to the phoneme and other constituents, which not only deprives them of their linguo-speech bases but also puts into question the appropriateness of their study in general.
This study is based on the well-established foundations of phonetics and phonology to explore the nature of the sound systems in both languages, while adhering to the methodological conditions that frame this type of comparative research. The study proceeds from the fundamental distinction between the two languages a...
Nouray Omer Ali, Atif Abdulla Ferhadi· Zanco Journal of Humanity Sc...· 0 citations
This paper examines the definition and differentiation of word and word-form in connection with a participle. The author notes that there have been diverse responses but no comprehensive answer has been given to this challenging question. Interestingly, one needs to note that the same is true for general linguistics to...
Աշոտ Մկրեան· Haigazian Armenological Revi...· 0 citations
The original inventory of NENA consonantal phonemes has undergone change in JSNENA due to convergence with the phonological systems of the Iranian languages of the region.This includes the loss of the original interdental consonants ✶ θ and ✶ ð, which have mostly been replaced by the lateral /l/.The interdentals origin...
Geoffrey Khan, Masoud Mohammadirad· Language Contact in Sanandaj· 0 citations
Dyachronical analysis of levels of word formation in the Old Armenian and Modern Armenian languages shows that certain old Armenian analytic constructions have been transformed into compound words. These, however, have preserved a meaningful plan in the Modern Armenian language, sometimes revealing differences in the s...
The semantic aspects of the grammatical category of occurrence and the forms of grammatical expression have often undergone changes during the historical development of the Armenian language. That is why they have often become the subject of examination and discussion in Armenian grammars. The question was addressed mo...
The Latin word modus is often translated simply as "manner".It originally meant "measure, weight", but is also etymologically related to the diminutive modulus, meaning "scale, small measure" and "model" (Müller 2009, 638).There is little evidence in the research literature on Mode 2 that the word describes a model of...