This paper presents a concise, end-to-end account of the recommended practices spanning the pipeline from satellite data to an operational map product, organized around six interconnected themes: the EO data infrastructure landscape, data selection and preprocessing, ML dataset construction and model training, uncertainty quantification, map production and distribution, and validation.
Abstract
Recent years have seen a rapid expansion in the production of large-scale geospatial maps derived from Earth observation (EO) data, driven largely by advances in machine learning (ML) and large computing infrastructure. Although the barrier to generating such maps has dropped substantially, established best practices have yet to emerge, and design decisions made early in the pipeline can quietly propagate errors into the final product. Producing a technically sound and scientifically credible product remains challenging. Choices made at every stage are tightly coupled: preprocessing decisions shape the training signal, dataset design governs what the model can learn and how reliably its performance can be assessed, and global-scale inference introduces engineering challenges in compute and data access at scale, as well as artifact mitigation. Furthermore, uncertainty quantification and independent map validation each require dedicated methodological attention that is often underestimated. This paper presents a concise, end-to-end account of the recommended practices spanning the pipeline from satellite data to an operational map product. We organize the discussion around six interconnected themes: the EO data infrastructure landscape, data selection and preprocessing, ML dataset construction and model training, uncertainty quantification, map production and distribution, and validation. This paper is a condensed version of a longer guide that provides greater depth across all stages, accessible online at ghjuliasialelli.github.io/ML-EO-Maps/.
Data-driven prediction and decision-making increasingly depend on large-scale data lakes and machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) analytics across a wide range of application domains. Nevertheless, although geospatial vector data constitutes a substantial fraction of contemporary datasets, it has remained prima...
Majid Saeedan, A. Belussi, Sara Migliorini et al.· GeoInformatica· 0 citations
GeoFMs extend this trajectory through large-scale self-supervised pretraining on Earth observation data, offering the potential to reduce dependence on task-specific labelled datasets and transfer learned representations across contexts and prediction tasks.
This survey reviews the development of Earth embeddings from foundation model pretraining and reusable encoders to global and near-global embedding products, and summarizes the technical and scientific challenges surrounding global embedding products.
This work finds that a two-stage training curriculum, combining deterministic pretraining with probabilistic tuning, transfers well to downscaling, beating the state-of-the-art for RMSE.
Joseph McLean, Tiffany J. Vlaar, Sigrid Passano Hellan et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes a process-level ML specification for openEO structured into three stages: model initialization, model actions (training, tuning, inference, validation), and model management, which supports classical algorithms such as Random Forest and SVM, as well as deep learning architectures for time-series and...
Brian Pondi, Jonas Hurst, Rolf Simoes et al.· 0 citations