Large language models as sources of patient information on robotic knee arthroplasty: a comparative evaluation.

Background

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is increasingly used because of its surgical precision. However, inconsistent outcomes and high costs often lead patients to seek additional information from artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT-4o, Gemini-2.5-Flash, and DeepSeek-V3 are commonly used, but their reliability and readability in orthopaedics remain unclear.

Objectives

To compare the reliability, usefulness, quality, and readability of responses to common patient questions about rTKA generated by leading LLMs.

Methods

Three LLMs answered 20 frequently asked patient questions (n = 20) identified through Google Trends and expert validation. Three orthopaedic specialists (n = 3) evaluated reliability, usefulness, and overall quality using validated scales, while readability was assessed with standard indices.

Results

Inter-rater reliability was good to excellent (ICC = 0.728-0.879). Gemini-2.5-Flash achieved significantly higher reliability and usefulness scores than ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 (all p < 0.05). ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 produced more readable but less accurate content, revealing an inverse relationship between reliability and readability.

Conclusions

Gemini-2.5-Flash provided the most reliable responses, highlighting the need for supervised integration of LLMs in patient education.