Skip to content
Open access

Development and External Validation of the GLORIA-AF Bleeding Weighted Risk Score for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Aug 2026 · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 0 citations
Medicine

Abstract

Aims

Major bleeding remains a major barrier to optimal anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to develop and externally validate a weighted score that balances simplicity and prediction for 1-year major bleeding prediction.

Methods

Using prospective multinational GLORIA-AF Phase II/III data, we developed the GLORIA-AF Bleeding Weighted Risk Score using LASSO-penalized regression with stability selection, coefficient-rescaling and internal validation. The score was externally evaluated in EORP-AF and APHRS-AF registries. Discrimination, calibration and clinical benefit were assessed using C-index, observed-to-expected ratio, calibration plot and decision-curve analysis, and compared with HAS-BLED, unweighted GLORIA-AF score and full multivariable Cox model.

Results

Among 20,250 eligible derivation cohort patients (69.9 [10.3] years; 9,092 female [44.9%]), 317 (1.6%) had major bleeding during 1-year follow-up. The derived score ranges from 0 to 22, with the highest weight (5) assigned to age >65 years, followed by abnormal kidney function (3). The derived score achieved C-index of 0.688 (95% CI: 0.660-0.717), outperforming HAS-BLED (C-index: 0.631, 95% CI: 0.604-0.658; P < 0.001), while preserving discrimination comparable to full multivariable regression (C-index: 0.690; 95%CI: 0.661-0.719; P = 0.084). Calibration was good (O:E ratio: 0.996) and DCA showed greater net benefit than HAS-BLED across 1% to 3% thresholds. Among 9,752 external validation patients, 148 (1.5%) had major bleeding. The derived score achieved C-index of 0.674 (95% CI: 0.643-0.705; P < 0.001), with better discrimination, calibration and clinical benefit than HAS-BLED.

Conclusions

The GLORIA-AF Bleeding Score showed modestly higher discrimination than HAS-BLED for 1-year major bleeding prediction while retaining clinical interpretability and usability. External validation in independent European and Asia-Pacific registries further supports its transportability beyond the derivation population.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.