Aug 2026· Dental journal· Vol 14, pp. 538· 0 citations· 37 references
Medicine
TL;DR
VST achieved high implant survival and favorable soft tissue and esthetic outcomes but did not significantly outperform comparator techniques in buccal bone plate thickness, with very low certainty.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Vestibular socket therapy (VST) is a minimally invasive technique for immediate implant placement (IIP) in compromised extraction sockets that reconstructs the deficient buccal plate while preserving the crestal soft tissue. Despite growing clinical adoption, the randomized evidence on its predictability and biological performance remains limited. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 and prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261288724), PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to January 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating VST with IIP. Risk of bias (RoB 2) and certainty of evidence (GRADE) were assessed. Final follow-up buccal bone plate thickness was pooled using a random-effects model; trials comparing variations within VST were reported narratively but not pooled. Results: Seven RCTs (186 participants) were included; implant survival was 99.5%, with no shield exposure, peri-implantitis, or dehiscence. Meta-analysis of the three trials comparing VST against a distinct alternative technique showed no significant between-group difference in final buccal bone plate thickness at any level: crestal +0.24 mm (95% CI−0.13 to 0.61; I2 = 45%), mid-root +0.32 mm (−0.45 to 1.09; I2 = 82%), or apical +0.19 mm (−0.48 to 0.87; I2 = 67%). VST showed minimal mid-facial recession, stable papillae, and Pink Esthetic Scores of 10.29–13.17. Certainty was very low for all outcomes. Conclusions: VST achieved high implant survival and favorable soft tissue and esthetic outcomes but did not significantly outperform comparator techniques in buccal bone plate thickness, with very low certainty. Adequately powered, independent trials with longer follow-up are needed.
Timing of implant placement after extraction of a maxillary esthetic-zone tooth remains debated, with immediate and delayed protocols each offering distinct clinical, esthetic, and patient-centered trade-offs.
To systematically review clinical, esthetic, volumetric, and patient-reported outcomes of immedia...
S. Joshi, N. Anasane, M. V. et al.· Journal of Oral Implantology· 0 citations
Both immediate implant placement and autotransplantation of mature teeth demonstrate high short- to mid-term success rates with no statistically significant difference observed between them and may represent viable treatment options for posterior teeth replacement.
Firas Elmsmari, Reem B. Abdelsayed, Nadin Abouseif et al.· Journal of Endodontics· 0 citations
Reinforced implant overdentures show high survival but require ongoing maintenance, and attachment design and reinforcement type primarily influence complication profiles rather than survival.
Meril Joseph, N. A. Sudharson, Nirmal Kurian et al.· The Journal of prosthetic de...· 0 citations
Background: Immediate implant placement (IIP) after tooth extraction is increasingly used in the esthetic zone because it can reduce treatment time and facilitate immediate provisionalization. However, post-extraction remodeling, thin facial bone, soft-tissue phenotype and implant-positioning demands may increase esthe...
Muneesh Joshi, Jasmohan Singh, Rajat Swami et al.· Adolescência e Saúde· 0 citations
Objectives. To integrate evidence from studies on how the timing of implant
placement, management of peri-implant soft tissue, the implant surface and macro
design, abutment design and materials, and the method of retention of the prosthesis,
affect the objectively assessed esthetic results of single-tooth implants loc...
K. P., Kamala Kannan Raja, Arun Prasad N. C et al.· European Journal of Prosthod...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.