PANDA is a scalable system that uses zero-knowledge proofs to prove the robustness and fairness properties of a model without revealing its private parameters, and can generate proofs of local robustness for neural networks with more than 2.9M parameters in 5 minutes, and can verify them in 10 seconds.
Abstract
With the growing deployment of machine learning models, formal guarantees of the robustness and fairness of these models have become increasingly important in safety-critical and legal-compliance settings. However, model parameters are often commercial secrets that cannot be disclosed to auditors or end users. To this end, we present PANDA, a scalable system that uses zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to prove the robustness and fairness properties of a model without revealing its private parameters. PANDA is built on top of CROWN, an efficient robustness certification framework that is used in many state-of-the-art formal verification tools for neural networks. The core contribution of PANDA is a novel algorithm for proving linear relaxation bounds for non-linear activation layers, yielding simple, lightweight proofs. Remarkably, our system can generate proofs of local robustness for neural networks with more than 2.9M parameters in 5 minutes, and can verify them in 10 seconds. Prior ZKP-based robustness system rely on exponential-time algorithms that cannot scale to nontrivial networks. In contrast, PANDA scales polynomially in the number of neurons in a network, allowing us to support neural networks 4 orders of magnitude larger than previous approaches with significantly reduced prover overhead.
Neural network verification and data privacy are inherently in tension: verification demands full access to model parameters and input data, yet both are increasingly restricted by privacy regulations and intellectual property constraints. This tension has left robustness verification impractical in privacy-sensitive domains. In this work, we address this gap with SecureCROWN, the first framework for privacy-preserving neural network robustness verification. Built upon secure two-party computation (2PC), our framework enables a model owner and a data owner to jointly compute certified robustness bounds -- revealing only the final result while provably protecting both parties'private data under the semi-honest security model. A key challenge is securely computing the conditional operations in Linear Bound Propagation, where the data-dependent branching is incompatible with standard secure computation protocols. We eliminate branching by formulating conditional logic as continuous arithmetic operations. Additionally, we introduce a Newton--Raphson refinement method to improve numerical stability. Extensive analysis and experiments show that SecureCROWN strictly matches plaintext verification results, while completing in 0.1--200s across varied model sizes and communication settings (LAN/WAN), demonstrating the feasibility of privacy-preserving neural network verification.
Nianyun Song, Xiaokun Luan, Yu Guo et al.· 1 citation
Randomized Smoothing (RS) provides rigorous robustness guarantees for neural networks without architectural constraints, yet its adoption is limited by extreme computational costs. Standard RS requires tens of thousands of model evaluations per input and forces practitioners to commit to fixed sample sizes a priori. In this work, we present a novel meta-learning framework for anytime-valid certified robustness that adaptively deploys computational resources. By using a lightweight meta-learner to predict image-specific priors for a sequential E-process, we achieve a 20-fold reduction in sample complexity compared to traditional methods while maintaining rigorous statistical guarantees. Beyond raw efficiency, we demonstrate how anytime-validity enables adaptively allocating compute based upon application-specific risk thresholds, a form of resource triage impossible under classic certification frameworks. That this is achievable while also providing similar certification performance demonstrates that our approach provides a pathway for real-time, safety-critical certification deployments.
A. C. Cullen, Paul Montague, Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Machine-learned predictions can speed up offline NP-hard optimization, but asking a predictor what to do amounts to asking it to solve the problem, and committing an unchecked prediction forfeits every worst-case guarantee. CASP (Certificate-Augmented Solution Pruning) instead asks which parts of the search space may be ignored, and accepts each answer only after a sound polynomial-time verifier has checked it, so correctness never depends on prediction quality. We develop the learning theory of this design. The verifier makes the induced loss class uniformly bounded, so certificate parameters are learnable from $\tilde O(\varepsilon^{-2}\log K)$ samples ($K$ the maximum instance size), whereas the unverified commitment class admits no distribution-free rate and, under cost spread $R$, none below $\Omega(R/\varepsilon^2)$. Filtering noisy predictions by verifiable confidence dominates the standard min-combiner, with a margin we compute in closed form, and the prediction stays useful even given the LP, because it breaks ties on degenerate optimal faces, where every symmetric LP policy, meaning one whose commitments depend on the instance only through the verifiable confidence values, provably stalls. Experiments on five problems test the theory's quantitative predictions. With trained predictors, unverified pruning loses up to $26%$ of the optimum under distribution shift, while the verified deployment of the same predictions loses nothing.
Modern machine learning (ML) increasingly relies on complex models whose behavior is difficult to characterize beyond empirical performance metrics. Across a wide range of tasks, including prediction, generation, and decision-making, models with similar empirical performance can exhibit markedly different properties in terms of their transparency, interpretability, robustness, fairness, privacy, and certifiability. This survey highlights how optimization- and certification-oriented reasoning can provide a useful framework for reasoning about such differences, supporting tasks ranging from model training and selection to auditing and certification. We review and synthesize recent advances at the intersection of combinatorial optimization (CO) and trustworthy ML, covering both training and post-training tasks, including interpretable model learning, explanation generation, robustness analysis, fairness auditing, model compression, and privacy attacks and protections. Across these domains, CO formulations offer additional capabilities over purely heuristic approaches, e.g., gradient-based ones, notably global guarantees, formal certificates, and explicit treatment of trade-offs. While scalability remains an important challenge, continued progress in solvers and hybrid algorithms suggests a growing role for CO in the design and deployment of trustworthy ML systems.
Privacy-preserving machine learning auditing protocols allow auditors to assess models for properties such as accuracy or fairness, without revealing their internals or training data. This makes them especially attractive for auditing models deployed in sensitive domains such as healthcare or finance. For these protocols to be meaningful in real-world audit settings, though, their guarantees must reflect how the model will behave once deployed, rather than merely certifying its behavior during an audit. Existing security definitions often miss this mark: most certify model behavior only on a fixed audit dataset, without ensuring that the same guarantees generalize to other datasets drawn from the same distribution. As we show, this gap allows a model provider to attack many cryptographic model certification (CMC) schemes built on secure zero knowledge proofs (ZKP) by carefully engineering training data, resulting in models that exhibit benign behavior during an audit, but pathological behavior in practice. For example, we empirically demonstrate that an attacker can certify that a model achieves over 99% accuracy on an audit dataset, but less than 30% accuracy on fresh samples from the same distribution. To address this gap, we formalize rigorous cryptographic security notions tailored to CMC frameworks, introduce a generic protocol template, and prove that it satisfies these requirements. Our results thus offer both cautionary evidence about existing approaches and constructive guidance for designing secure, privacy-preserving ML auditing protocols.
Carter Luck, Olive Franzese-McLaughlin, Elisaweta Masserova et al.· 0 citations
Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) is the foundation of modern machine learning (ML). In privacy-sensitive settings, gradients can reveal details about individual data points. Differential Privacy (DP) protects sensitive data during ML training by clipping gradients and adding calibrated Gaussian noise. However, existing frameworks assume semi-honest participants, which fails in adversarial or federated environments where malicious actors can bypass or alter the noise addition process, breaking privacy guarantees. We present VeriDP, a framework for verifiable differentially private training that cryptographically enforces and proves the correct execution of differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) in zero knowledge. VeriDP integrates Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) with polynomial commitments, sumcheck and GKR-based proofs, and incrementally verifiable computation (IVC) to generate compact proofs of correct gradient computation, clipping, averaging, and Gaussian noise generation—without revealing private data or randomness. Unlike previous systems that only verify the final privacy budget, VeriDP enables per-iteration verifiability of each model update, providing strong privacy assurances even in adversarial settings. This establishes a novel and complete Zero-Knowledge Proof of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (ZK-DPSGD), uniting differential privacy and verifiable computation for secure and auditable ML. Our evaluation shows that prover time increases linearly with the number of input samples, while both verifier time (2–5 ms) and proof size (3–4 KB) remain compact and effectively constant.
B. Abdolmaleki, Amir R. Asadi, Vahid R. Asadi et al.· Proceedings on Privacy Enhan...· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduAug 18, 2026
A new method for surgically removing training examples from a model reveals that as datasets grow, the link between what a model learns and what it produces dissolves.
