This review comprehensively examines the biological significance of PPIs in human disease and details how MPPs effectively modulate historically undruggable targets, highlighting current synthetic strategies, peptide engineering platforms, and the clinical and preclinical status of leading MPP candidates, while weighing their operational advantages and limitations.
Abstract
Macrocyclic peptides and peptidomimetics (MPPs) have emerged as a powerful therapeutic class in peptide-based drug discovery, uniquely positioned to modulate challenging protein-protein interactions (PPIs). While dysregulated PPIs drive diverse human pathologies, including cancer, metabolic disorders, neurodegenerative proteinopathies, inflammatory conditions, and microbial infections, targeting them remains difficult. Traditional small molecules lack the surface area to bind large, flat PPI interfaces, whereas linear peptides suffer from rapid proteolytic degradation and poor cell permeability. MPPs overcome these limitations by bridging the gap between small molecules and biologics. Their cyclic architecture provides conformational rigidity minimizing entropic penalties and maximizing binding affinity and selectivity. This structural pre-organization also enhances metabolic robustness, protease resistance, and cellular permeability. This review comprehensively examines the biological significance of PPIs in human disease and details how MPPs effectively modulate historically undruggable targets. We highlight current synthetic strategies, peptide engineering platforms, and the clinical and preclinical status of leading MPP candidates, while weighing their operational advantages and limitations. Finally, we analyze the contemporary market trajectory and emerging commercial opportunities, positioning MPPs as next-generation, PPI-targeting therapeutics.
This review highlights classification frameworks, design strategies, and synthetic approaches, emphasizing their impact on modern drug discovery and therapeutic development.
A. Sharma, Happy, K. Verma et al.· Current Pharmaceutical Resea...· 0 citations
This review highlights recent clinical advances-including motixafortide and zilucoplan-and examines how UAAs are deployed to optimize drug-like characteristics across diverse therapeutic areas, and discusses emerging strategies, illustrative case studies, and design principles that collectively support the development...
Krishna K. Sharma, K. Sharma, Anku Sharma et al.· Angewandte Chemie· 0 citations
Peptide and peptoid are two types of peptidomimetics can be used as drugs for diseases. One of the main hallmarks in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is Aβ aggregation. Due to the natural affinity between peptide and Aβ proteins, peptide therapeutics are found out to be suitable for the disease, as they are almost nontoxic,...
Xiao-Ping Huang, Si-Jie Ma, Xiang Li et al.· Bioconjugate chemistry· 0 citations
A broad overview of tools for in silico MAP design, prediction of functional structural ensembles and physicochemical properties, structure–function relationships, drug-target interactions, and formulation strategies for in vivo delivery is provided.
Bing Zan, Charles H. Chen, Mehwish Sabha et al.· Chemical Reviews· 0 citations
Anticancer peptides (ACPs) are frequently discussed as a single therapeutic class, yet the term encompasses molecules that perform markedly different jobs: direct tumor-cell killing, intracellular target modulation, tumor homing and penetration, or selective delivery of a separate payload. This functional diversity cre...
This study highlights MMs02350546 as a potential disruptor of HSP90–CDC37 interaction, presenting a promising therapeutic strategy against cancer via chaperone complex destabilization.