This study examines the growing influence of artificial intelligence (AI) tools on student research in higher education, focusing on both their opportunities and challenges, and recommends comprehensive institutional guidelines, targeted training programs, and ethical frameworks to ensure responsible integration of AI.
Abstract
This study examines the growing influence of artificial intelligence (AI) tools on student research in higher education, focusing on both their opportunities and challenges. AI-powered writing assistants, literature review platforms, citation generators, and data analysis tools are increasingly integrated into academic workflows. Findings show that these tools enhance efficiency and quality by automating repetitive tasks such as grammar checking, citation management, and data organization. Students reported positive impacts, with weighted mean scores indicating agreement that AI improves clarity in writing (3.81), supports data analysis (3.71), and strengthens overall research quality (3.85). These opportunities allow learners to devote more time to higher-order skills such as critical analysis, argumentation, and creative idea generation. However, the study also highlights significant challenges. Students expressed concerns about limited training (3.65), difficulties in trusting AI-generated results (3.68), and the need for greater institutional support (3.70). Neutral responses regarding access barriers (3.28) and effective tool usage (2.97) suggest uneven readiness across the academic community. Ethical issues such as academic integrity, over-reliance on technology, and risks of unintentional plagiarism further complicate AI’s role in research. The finding shows the underscore of the dual nature of AI in higher education: it offers powerful opportunities to enhance research productivity and learning outcomes, yet it also presents risks that must be carefully managed. The study concludes by recommending comprehensive institutional guidelines, targeted training programs, and ethical frameworks to ensure responsible integration of AI.
Investigating how experienced developers use agents in building software, including their motivations, strategies, task suitability, and sentiments finds that while experienced developers value agents as a productivity boost, they retain their agency in software design and implementation out of insistence on fundamental software quality attributes.
This systematic review evaluates 55 studies from 2017 to 2023 on the application of machine learning techniques to ASD, highlighting key challenges and opportunities, particularly the need for models that can integrate complex data to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes.
Rafael Muñoz-Terol, Jesús Peral, Sandra Amador et al.· Heliyon· 4 citations· ⚡1
This paper identifies two different routes through which models can acquire geometrically separable features: they can learn them from complementary co-occurrence signals in general language data, including text-number co-occurrence and cross-number interaction, or from multi-token addition problems.
This survey model agent state as a dynamic graph, where memories, tools, skills, workflows, and inter-agent relations are represented as typed nodes, edges, and subgraphs updated through schema-constrained rewrites to provide a compact structural lens for designing and governing self-evolving agents.
Yuanyuan Xu, Wenjie Zhang, Yin Chen et al.· 2 citations
A novel quantum generative model for synthesizing tabular data by proposing a quantum generative adversarial network architecture with flexible data encoding and a novel quantum circuit ansatz for effectively modeling tabular data is introduced.
P. Bhardwaj, Caitlin Jones, Lasse Dierich et al.· Scientific Reports· 2 citations