This analysis characterizes the existence, structure, and computational complexity of the Nash and Stackelberg equilibria, showing how the attacker's observation of the defense affects equilibrium behavior and when optimal strategies become difficult to compute.
Abstract
Infrastructure networks increasingly rely on distributed sensing to detect intrusions before attackers reach valuable assets. Yet sensing devices, communication resources, and edge server capacity are limited, while intelligent attackers can adapt their routes to the deployed defense. Motivated by integrated sensing and communication (ISAC), we study how sensing and processing resources should be allocated under strategic interaction between a defender and an attacker. We formulate their interaction as a graph security game in which the defender deploys sensing actions under resource and false alarm constraints, while the attacker selects routes to valuable targets. We consider simultaneous play and settings in which the attacker observes either a pure defender configuration or a mixed defender strategy. Our analysis characterizes the existence, structure, and computational complexity of the Nash and Stackelberg equilibria, showing how the attacker's observation of the defense affects equilibrium behavior and when optimal strategies become difficult to compute. We develop algorithms that construct effective pure configurations and refine restricted games for mixed Nash and mixed Stackelberg play. On enumerable instances, their solutions have small mean normalized differences from fully enumerated references; the methods also apply when exhaustive strategy enumeration is impractical. We also identify conditions under which Nash and mixed Stackelberg payoffs are ordered or coincide.
We study a two-player network inspection game in which a defender coordinates sensors with potentially heterogenous detection capabilities to detect attacks from a strategic attacker. We assume that there are multiple sensor types, each determined by its detected area coverage when placed at a location. The objective o...
This paper studies an observable pure-strategy setting in which multiple heterogeneous defenders independently allocate limited resources before an attacker selects a target, and gives a necessary-and-sufficient equilibrium characterization and sufficient conditions for pure-strategy existence.
Lei Cui, Yifan Li, Shu-Han Qi et al.· Journal of King Saud Univers...· 0 citations
This paper formulate a multi-resource allocation problem in the form of a General Lotto game where a defender possesses various types of resources, and introduces a feature that their individual effectiveness against different types of attacks is characterized by a network weight matrix.
Faezeh Shojaeighadikolaei, K. Paarporn· 0 citations
Recently, the theory of Boolean Dynamical Systems was proposed to study the decision theory surrounding the defense of computer networks against Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs). Boolean Dynamical Systems naturally capture four first principle primitives of APTs: the stealthy nature of attacks, limited and noisy info...
Brandon C. Collins, K. Paarporn, Shou-Huai Xu et al.· 0 citations
This work shows that an optimal attacker policy on a two-terminal series-parallel attack graph is an index policy: at each step, the attacker selects an available control with the largest value of an extension of the classical Gittins index, the first optimal index characterization for adaptive attackers in security ga...
A strategic conflict between two players—a telecommunications network operator seeking to maximize network availability after an attack and an attacker seeking to minimize it—is studied using a game‐theoretic framework and the resulting method remains computationally efficient even for large‐scale networks with a vast...
Michał Pióro, Mariusz Mycek, A. Tomaszewski et al.· Networks· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.