Skip to content
Preprint

A Smallest-Need-First Job Scheduling Framework with Adaptive Optimization of Idle Node Counts for Energy-Efficient HPC Systems

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 35 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

SNF-ICON is presented, an event-driven controller combining smallest-need-first (SNF) gang scheduling, predictive wake timing, and adaptive warm-spare control that reduces average waiting time relative to the FCFS-based baseline in all six cases and remains close to at least one heuristic energy baseline in five.

Abstract

Power-state management in high-performance computing (HPC) clusters must reduce idle energy without excessive wake-up delays for rigid parallel jobs. This paper presents SNF-ICON, an event-driven controller combining smallest-need-first (SNF) gang scheduling, predictive wake timing, and adaptive warm-spare control. At each scheduler invocation, recent interarrival and completed-service samples are screened for sufficiency, exponential-like variability, low lag-one autocorrelation, and acceptable Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance. Rejected or data-sparse windows use SNF+IPM (Intelligent Power Manager), whereas accepted windows activate release prediction and an exponential next-event model. Warm-spare optimization is applied only when queue, event, and arrival-recency conditions permit, balancing estimated waiting and non-compute energy over a timeout-capped horizon. We evaluate four DAS2 trace segments and a generated Markovian workload on AOBA-derived 64-node models, plus SDSC Blue on an AOBA-derived 1152-node model. SNF-ICON is compared with SNF+IPM and First Come First Served (FCFS) + backfilling with IPM. It reduces average waiting time relative to the FCFS-based baseline in all six cases and remains close to at least one heuristic energy baseline in five. The generated workload spends substantial time in ICON mode, whereas DAS2 workloads operate mainly in fallback. Furthermore, cross-platform results show strong dependence on node-transition and power models. Thus, no single policy or parameter set works best in every case.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Retention-Based Energy-Efficient and High-Core-Utilization Scheduling for Arbitrary-Deadline DAGs

A retention-oriented scheduling framework for always-on arbitrary-deadline Directed Acyclic Graph workloads, consisting of two algorithms with a clear progression, and shows that, compared with a representative work-conserving baseline with automatic retention/PG, PREHS reduces static energy consumption.

Xiangzhen Xiao, Weijie Wang, Wei-Chen Liu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Feature Engineering for Queue Waiting Time Prediction: Temporal and Queue-State Reconstruction on the Theta Supercomputer

A log-based feature engineering approach designed to significantly improve queue waiting time prediction accuracy is proposed in this study, and feature redundancy is eliminated through comparative analysis, and temporal features capturing periodic job submission patterns are generated.

Tsatsral Amarbayasgalan, Eunhye Kim, Ju-Won Park · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Hierarchical Scheduler with Adaptive Time-Budget Reallocation for Time-Triggered Edge-Fog-Cloud Architectures

The lack of determinism restricts the integration of safety-critical applications into Edge–Fog–Cloud (EFC) architectures. Existing EFC schedulers are typically designed for dynamic, best-effort operation based on unmanaged resource allocation and elastic virtualization. This paradigm introduces unbounded queueing, res...

Omar Hekal, Josepaul Paulachan, Daniel Onwuchekwa et al. · 0 citations
Book Open access Sep 2026

Execution-Driven Auto-Tuning of Static Schedules for Resource-Efficient HPC

Task-based HPC runtimes are typically tuned under a performance-first requirement with the assumption that the fastest configuration requires all available cores. This paper asks whether that assumption holds, and whether high performance can be achieved with fewer resources. We study this question using SWITCHES, a ta...

Hui-Min Zhang, Andreas Diavastos · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Kernel-Level Dynamic Priority Scheduling for Containers

A dynamic priority scheduling framework at the kernel level that enhances the CPU allocation to latency-sensitive containers running in Kubernetes environments and reveals a significant improvement in terms of latency reduction, enhanced throughput, efficient utilization of CPU resources, and stable performance of sche...

T. Rajkumar, Nishanth D., P. M et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.