Skip to content
Open access

Integrating MCDA and economic evaluation into a rule-based framework for hospital-level health technology assessment

Jul 2026 · Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment · Vol 13, pp. 201 - 210 · 0 citations · 13 references
Medicine

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) supports evidence-based decision-making, but integrating economic evaluation within Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) remains challenging in hospital-level HTA. This study developed and preliminarily applied an integrated decision-support framework combining MCDA, economic evaluation, and contextualized evidence assessment to support adoption recommendations. Methods: A pragmatic digital framework integrated MCDA with Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) and Cost-Consequence Analysis (CCA) within a rule-based decision matrix. The economic module estimated cost per patient, incremental cost, budget impact, cost-consequence outputs, and, when appropriate, a supportive soft ICER. Evidence was assessed through structured critical appraisal, Summary of Findings tables, and outcome relevance, using a GRADE-informed approach mapped onto the predefined 0-1-3-5-7-9 MCDA evidence scale. Operational robustness was assessed through Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and self-audit controls. Results: In a case study comparing disposable and reusable continence care systems, the disposable option showed a lower MCDA score than the current standard (2.60 vs 4.80; ΔMCDA = -2.20) and a higher cost per patient (€1.00 vs €0.65; incremental cost €0.35). Although the 3-year budget impact was €2,634 and remained within the institutional affordability threshold, the technology was classified as dominated because it generated lower value at a higher cost. The final recommendation was not favorable for routine adoption. Conclusion: The framework supports transparent integration of MCDA and economic evaluation in hospital-level HTA and helps distinguish affordability from overall value. The case study suggests that technologies should not be adopted solely because their budget impact is acceptable when the value-risk profile is unfavorable. Further validation across technologies and settings is required.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.