Across 54 confirmed CI cyberattacks from 2010 through 2024 spanning twelve named CI sectors plus a cross-sector category, paired with 12 null-control vulnerability cases drawn from the same source space, this work audit per-source attack coverage, null-case contamination, and signal lead time for ten public OSINT source classes that meet a minimum-volume threshold.
Abstract
Defenders of critical infrastructure (CI) subscribe to many public open-source intelligence (OSINT) feeds without an empirical basis for which feeds actually precede attacks. We provide one. Across 54 confirmed CI cyberattacks from 2010 through 2024 spanning twelve named CI sectors plus a cross-sector category (consolidation rules in Section IV), paired with 12 null-control vulnerability cases drawn from the same source space, we audit per-source attack coverage, null-case contamination, and signal lead time for ten public OSINT source classes that meet a minimum-volume threshold. Sources separate cleanly into three operationally distinct mission profiles (pooled Fisher exact p = 3.4x10^-8): precursor (six classes with zero observed null firings at coverage at or above 5%), disclosure-exposure (three classes whose null contamination meets or exceeds attack coverage), and one large broad-coverage class that mixes the two profiles but retains 91.3% within-corpus precision. The precision-side classification is stable across a 2019 temporal partition and across a US-versus-non-US geographic partition. Two sources, one broad-coverage and one precursor, cover 92.6% of corpus attacks; three cover 96.3%. The greedy portfolio at k = 3 outperforms the mean random three-source subset by 39.8 percentage points. Several source classes widely treated as canonical for industrial control system defense fall into the disclosure-exposure profile by operational mission, not by quality. Per-sector, per-actor, and per-jurisdiction portfolios diverge in rank order despite a shared rank-one source. The corpus, linkage protocol, and classification rules are released.
Water distribution networks (WDNs) are critical infrastructure governed by legacy industrial protocols and lack inherent security. Assessing exposure requires a testbed where the consequences are computed rather than scripted. Existing EPANET-based platforms declare attacks in advance as fixed perturbations because no...
Valentine Machaka, S. Arrizabalaga, Beñat Elduayen-Echave et al.· Water Research· 0 citations
A meta-review of 18 studies between 2019 and 2026, from which 83 ICS, or ICS directly related, cybersecurity datasets are identified, harmonised, and characterised using a unified five-dimensional taxonomy, identifies three structural imbalances which constrain the scope and feasibility of several evaluation practices.
Konstantinos E. Kampourakis, Vyron Kampourakis, Georgios Kambourakis et al.· 1 citation
While LLM-based attackers exhibit growing proficiency in vulnerability exploitation, most existing cybersecurity benchmarks suffer from single-stage truncation, prematurely terminating evaluation upon initial access. In practice, initial footholds are exceptionally fragile across operational disruptions such as service...
Su-Jin Chen, Lijun Li, Xu-Hong Wang et al.· 0 citations
PrivEscalate is presented, a large-scale benchmark for Linux privilege escalation, comprising 531 Dockerized scenarios spanning 14 sub-categories and PrivEscalate, a domain-specialized wrapper that augments a generic ReAct agent with deterministic enumeration, category matching, and step planning that improves over pri...
Yi-Xuan Liu, Zi-Long Zhen, Yin Wu et al.· 0 citations
Background: Iterative feedback loops are the dominant paradigm for improving LLM-generated Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC): validators such as Checkov and terraform validate feed error signals back for successive repair attempts. Prior work reports cumulative-best metrics, which are non-decreasing by construction, so the...