Skip to content

A Driver‐Aware Machine Learning Approach for Predicting the Severity of Decadal‐Scale Extreme Climate Events

Aug 2026 · International Journal of Climatology · 0 citations · 45 references

TL;DR

An integrated framework providing a way to incorporate information on large‐scale climate drivers into data‐driven prediction models is proposed and shown to incorporate information on large‐scale climate drivers into data‐driven prediction models.

Abstract

The prediction of the decadal‐scale severities of extreme wet and dry events requires long‐term records of data to capture long‐term fluctuations. Recently, purely data‐driven machine learning models have shown excellent performance in modelling precipitation and other water cycle variables when sufficiently long and comprehensive training datasets are available, but their predictive reliability may be limited when long training records are unavailable. To better understand and predict extreme climate event severities at the basin scale, we propose an integrated framework coupling driver analysis and machine learning methods. Combined with the driver analysis method, the long short‐term memory (LSTM) model and the support vector regression (SVR) model are jointly used to predict extreme event severities in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) in the next decade. The results showed that extreme dry events are mainly driven by the long‐term signals of global warming, the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) in the YRB. Extreme wet events are dominated by the long‐term signals of the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI), global warming, and the PDO. In 2030, the spatial distribution patterns of both extreme dry event severities and extreme wet event severities in the YRB will potentially be more scattered. Compared to 2020, there will be at most 30% increases and at most 20% decreases in extreme dry event severity in 2030 across the YRB, with a maximum increase in extreme wet event severity of 60% and a maximum decrease of approximately 20% in 2030. The proposed framework provides a way to incorporate information on large‐scale climate drivers into data‐driven prediction models.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

A Hybrid Framework Combining Physical and Data‐Driven Models for Predicting the Timing of Fault Instability

Reliable prediction of earthquakes and rock mass failure has long been hampered by a fundamental trade‐off: achieving both a long warning window and high prediction accuracy. Physical models, such as the failure forecast method (FFM) based on the time‐reversed Omori law, can provide longer warning windows but are sen...

Jian‐Zhi Zhang, Tao-tao Zhang, Tao Zhou et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

In the Age of AI—Are National Models and Data Sets Still Important for Stream Flow Prediction?

Accurate streamflow prediction is critical for effective water resource management, and recent advances in deep learning and multi‐basin data sets have significantly improved model skill. Global deep‐learning models, trained on thousands of catchments have demonstrated strong generalization across diverse climates an...

Brett Snider, Ehsan Roshani · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

A Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Daily Precipitation Forecasting Using Satellite-Based Meteorological Data

This research establishes that with robust, automated feature engineering, modern machine learning models can explain approximately 68% of the variance in daily precipitation, providing a valuable and rigorously validated tool for a wide range of hydrological applications and setting a realistic performance benchmark.

Tevfik Denizhan Müftüoğlu · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Riverine Flood Forecasting Using Advanced Deep Learning Approaches

Analysis of riverine flood forecasting models revealed that PatchTST outperformed the other models during moderate‐flow regimes while falling behind during extreme flooding events, and sensitivity analysis results indicated that PatchTST was slightly more sensitive to the selected training data features.

Krishna Panthi, Mostafa Saberian, Vidya S. Samadi · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Deep learning techniques for extreme rainfall prediction: a review of state-of-the-art

The analysis reveals a transition from deterministic DI models to hybrid, physics-informed, uncertainty-aware, and operational forecasting systems that increasingly integrate AI with physical knowledge and heterogeneous environmental observations.

Braiton U. Mukhalela, S. Viriri, D. Ndzi et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Non-Autoregressive Machine Learning for Spring Discharge Forecasting: A Bias-Corrected CNN–LSTM Approach

This study develops and evaluates a suite of non-autoregressive machine learning architectures, MLP, CNN, LSTM, and a hybrid CNN–LSTM, for predicting the monthly discharge of major springs supplying Palermo, Italy, offering water authorities an effective solution for proactive and sustainable management of this crucial...

Francesco Castaldo, Claudio Arena, L. Noto · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.