Skip to content

Recursive Harness Self-Improvement

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.15524 · 10 citations
Computer Science

TL;DR

Recursive Harness Self-Improvement is introduced, which represents the harness as a prompt-level specification of the agent loop and iteratively refines it using pairwise feedback over its own revision history, suggesting RHI as a practical algorithm for continual learning within the paradigm of model--harness co-evolution.

Abstract

Under model--harness co-evolution, harnesses are not merely inference-time scaffolds but data-generating components whose execution traces can shape future foundation models. This motivates harness-in-the-loop learning: optimizing harnesses for both immediate agent performance and the quality of traces used for future model training. However, continually updating provider-built scaffolds is costly and labor-intensive. We therefore investigate whether optimizing user-constructed harnesses in a task-specific manner can improve execution-trace quality while remaining computationally lightweight and requiring only a few update iterations. To this end, we introduce Recursive Harness Self-Improvement (RHI), which represents the harness as a prompt-level specification of the agent loop and iteratively refines it using pairwise feedback over its own revision history. Across 30 synthetic machine-learning research tasks spanning quantitative finance, robotics, and pharmacy, a few RHI iterations suffice to substantially raise the performance ceiling of low-reasoning-effort agents, exceeding the corresponding maximum-reasoning-effort setting while reducing inference cost by up to 60%. We show that these gains arise primarily from improved task-specific context management through more effective inter-agent information flow rather than longer reasoning traces. Finally, we formalize this behavior as an information-theoretic hypothesis for RHI's implicit optimization objective, suggesting RHI as a practical algorithm for continual learning within the paradigm of model--harness co-evolution.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Harness-R1: Learning to Edit Executable Runtime Harnesses from Agent Failure Trajectories

This work introduces Harness-R1, the first method, to the authors' knowledge, that makes failure-conditioned, lifecycle-wide editing of an existing executable runtime a learned capability, and post-trains a dedicated harness engineer with online reinforcement learning so that its edits are optimized for the realized ta...

Shuai Shao, Kangning Zhang, Qingyao Li et al. · 10 citations · ⚡2
Jul 2026

Co-Harness: Co-Evolving Harnesses and Model Weights for LLM Agents

Co-Harness is introduced, a framework that jointly optimizes the agent harness and model parameters during post-training and suggests that joint harness and model optimization is an effective way to improve agents beyond fixed-harness post-training.

Zhengyu Chen, Teng Xiao, Huaisheng Zhu et al. · 4 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

JIT-Agent: Scaling Harness Intelligence via Just-in-Time Harness Evolution

To the authors' knowledge, JIT-Agent is the first model purpose-built for just-in-time harness generation, establishing harness intelligence as a trainable, transferable, and compounding dimension of agent capability orthogonal to model scaling.

Gui-Bin Zhang, Leo Lu, Fang-Zhou Xie et al. · 14 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

AutoSaddler: Automatic Harness Optimization with Durable Updates from Agent Execution Traces

The proposed AutoSaddler, an automatic harness optimization framework that formulates harness improvement as an offline learning problem and iteratively updates the harness using failure signals from mini-batches, suggests that automatic harness optimization is a promising path toward more performant and reliable agent...

Sungho Park, Wonjoong Kim, Rongyuan Tan et al. · 15 citations · ⚡1
#machine learning Preprint Jul 2026

Learning to Control LLM Agent Harnesses with Offline Reinforcement Learning

Large language model (LLM) agents are usually improved by changing prompts, models, or hand-written workflows, while the execution harness around the model is treated as fixed infrastructure. We argue that this harness is itself a learnable control layer. We formalize harness operation as a finite-horizon Harness MDP,...

Haiwen Yi, Xinyuan Song · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.