Skip to content
Open access

Artificial intelligence meets pediatric orthopedics: A comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.0, and Claude 3.5 in detecting supracondylar humeral fractures

Jul 2026 · PLoS ONE · Vol 21, pp. e0353782 - e0353782 · 0 citations · 27 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Current LLMs demonstrate limited capability as independent diagnostic tools for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures and require specialized pediatric training before clinical implementation, however, their potential as assistive tools for triage and assessment warrants further development of pediatric-specific models.

Abstract

Background Supracondylar humeral fractures constitute 10–16% of pediatric skeletal injuries, requiring timely diagnosis to prevent neurovascular complications. Developmental variations in pediatric bone structures pose diagnostic challenges for clinicians. This study evaluated three next-generation large language models (LLMs) (ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.0, Claude 3.5) for detecting pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures and their classification according to the Gartland system. Methods This retrospective observational study included 300 pediatric patients (150 with supracondylar humeral fractures confirmed by expert consensus, 150 without fractures) aged 2–10 years presenting to the Emergency Department of the Bilkent City Hospital (October 2022-January 2025). Two-view elbow radiographs were presented to each LLM three times on different days. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using overall accuracy (all three responses correct), strict accuracy (≥2 correct responses), and ideal accuracy (≥1 correct response). Response consistency was assessed using Fleiss’ Kappa coefficient. Fractures were classified according to modified Gartland criteria. Results Gemini 2.0 demonstrated highest sensitivity (68.4%) followed by Claude 3.5 (58.7%) and ChatGPT-4o (19.3%) for fracture detection (p < 0.001). Ideal accuracy rates were 83.3%, 78.7%, and 27.3% respectively. Although ideal accuracy rates exceeded 91% in non-fracture cases, specificity remained low (33.1–36.0%), indicating a high rate of false-positive classifications. Response consistency was very good for ChatGPT-4o (κ = 0.69) and Gemini 2.0 (κ = 0.61), good for Claude 3.5 (κ = 0.44). For Gartland classification, Gemini 2.0 achieved highest accuracy: Type I (83.3%), Type II (62.4%), Type III (68.7%). Conclusion Current LLMs demonstrate limited capability as independent diagnostic tools for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. Gemini 2.0’s 68.4% sensitivity indicates these technologies require specialized pediatric training before clinical implementation. However, their potential as assistive tools for triage and assessment warrants further development of pediatric-specific models.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Large language models demonstrate variable diagnostic performance and a systematic risk of undertriage in surgical triage of feline metacarpal and metatarsal fractures.

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiple large language models (LLMs) against expert consensus in determining surgical intervention needs for feline metacarpal and metatarsal fractures. Methods In this retrospective study (December 2023 to February 2025), 73 clinical cases of feline metacarpal and...

S. Okur, Ç. Özkalıpçı, Büşra Baykal et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Artificial intelligence advancements for orthopaedic clinical reasoning: longitudinal assessment of newer models (ChatGPT-5, Grok-3, Gemini 2.5 Flash) compared to clinicians

This descriptive study aimed to longitudinally evaluate the performance of contemporary large language models - ChatGPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Flash, and Grok-3 - on orthopaedic clinical multiple-choice tasks, benchmarked against pooled clinician consensus. A secondary aim was to assess whether recent advances in generative AI...

Suzen Agharia, Shayan Soroush, Daniel Ameen et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial intelligence in clinical decision-making: a comparison of ChatGPT 5.0 and Gemini 3.0 in otologic cases

While both models show potential as clinical decision-support tools, Gemini 3.0 exhibited superior diagnostic performance in real-world otologic cases in the first study evaluating LLMs using real-world otologic data.

Bilge Tuna, Gokhan Tuzemen, Hasan Mutlu · 0 citations
Open access Mar 2026

Can Large Language Models Identify When an Upper Extremity Problem Needs Nonurgent Attention? An Assessment of Multiple LLM Chatbots

The finding that LLMs can distinguish urgent from nonurgent upper extremity conditions suggests that artificial intelligence tools could help reduce unnecessary use of high-cost emergency services, allowing those resources to be reserved for patients who require timely care.

Jefferson Hunter, David C. Ring, Prakash Jayakumar · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

How Successful Is Artificial Intelligence in Hand Surgery Questions of the Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Board Exams?

Current LLMs demonstrate a high level of factual knowledge in hand surgery board examination questions, and while these models cannot replace formal medical training or clinical judgment, they may serve as supportive tools in orthopedic education and exam preparation.

A. Acar, A. B. Girgin, Sema Cihan · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence Answering Patient Questions About Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Accuracy, Readability, and Clinical Utility.

It is suggested that AI chatbots may serve as useful adjunct educational tools for patients and caregivers within military healthcare systems, however, variability in expert interpretation and the potential for patient misinterpretation underscore the continued importance of clinician oversight when integrating AI-gene...

Michael G Johnston, William J Ferris, Harrison Diaz et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.