Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

WHY BINARY!!

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

WHY BINARY? Rethinking the Fundamental Architecture of Computation This paper explores a fundamental question about the architecture of modern computing: Is binary computation the only practical foundation for building intelligent machines, or can computation be reimagined around physical representations of information and intelligence? The rapid development of artificial intelligence has exposed limitations in conventional computing architectures, particularly the increasing cost of moving data between processors and memory, the energy required for large-scale AI workloads, and the dependence on centralized cloud infrastructure. This work proposes a conceptual shift toward AI as a physical computing substrate. Instead of treating an AI model merely as software executed on conventional processors, the paper explores the possibility of embedding the computational structure of an AI model directly into specialized hardware or semiconductor architectures. In such a system, model parameters and physical computation could become part of the hardware itself, allowing inference and other AI operations to occur locally with reduced data movement and potentially lower latency and energy consumption. The paper examines the implications of this approach for edge AI, neuromorphic and in-memory computing, semiconductor design, AI accelerators, and future computing architectures. It also considers the broader question of whether future computers should continue to separate software, computation, memory, and physical hardware in the way conventional architectures do today. Rather than presenting a finished commercial technology, this paper is intended as a conceptual and exploratory research proposal. Its purpose is to stimulate discussion and further research into architectures in which intelligence is not simply executed by hardware, but is more deeply embodied within the physical computing substrate itself. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, AI Hardware, Edge AI, Semiconductor Architecture, In-Memory Computing, Neuromorphic Computing, AI Accelerators, Hardware-Embedded AI, Computing Architecture, Physical Computing, Machine Learning Hardware, Future Computing.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

GPT-Lab Sep 17, 2026

Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering

AI is making software generation faster, but speed does not remove the need for expertise. As more work is delegated to AI, tacit knowledge may become one of the most important human advantages in software engineering. The post Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering appeared first on GPT-Lab.

Microsoft Research Blog Aug 31, 2026

GigaPath-Flash and GigaTIME-Flash: Toward population-scale discovery with efficient pathology foundation models

What if pathology foundation models could do more with less? GigaPath-Flash and GigaTIME-Flash cut computational demands while maintaining strong performance, opening the door to larger studies and broader exploration. The post GigaPath-Flash and GigaTIME-Flash: Toward population-scale discovery with efficient pathology foundation models appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.