Sep 2026· IMA Journal of Management Mathematics· 1 citation
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
TL;DR
A systematic literature review analyzing 111 papers from scientific databases on integrating AI with MCDM/A methods offers both a conceptual consolidation for scholars and a structured foundation for the design of next-generation, human-centered intelligent decision support systems (IDSS).
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has advanced significantly in the 21st century, evolving into a crucial tool for decision-making. A prominent trend is its integration with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making/Aiding (MCDM/A) methods to support complex decisions across diverse engineering domains. This paper presents a systematic literature review analyzing 111 papers from scientific databases on integrating AI with MCDM/A methods. Unlike prior reviews that primarily catalogue methods or hybrid techniques, this study introduces a socio-technical analytical framework comprising three layers—technical configurations, functional mechanisms, and human–AI collaboration patterns—to explain how and why AI reshapes multicriteria decision processes. The findings reveal recurrent architectural patterns, identify dominant functional roles of AI across decision-process phases, and uncover an emerging shift from automation-oriented systems toward augmentation-based decision support. Rather than providing a purely descriptive mapping of the literature, this review undertakes an investigative task guided by a socio-technical framework. By examining how structural configurations of AI–MCDM/A integration reshape the stages of the decision process and redistribute roles between humans and AI, the study moves beyond cataloguing techniques to uncover underlying integration logics, structural tensions, and developmental trajectories. In doing so, it offers both a conceptual consolidation for scholars and a structured foundation for the design of next-generation, human-centered intelligent decision support systems (IDSS).
A new AI assisted Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making model is presented to assess the performance of an organization and to assist in making strategic management decisions to enhance the decision consistency, transparency of decision making, strategic alignment and managerial responsiveness.
Anurag Agarwal· Journal of Intelligent Decis...· 0 citations
Examination of multi-criteria decision-making techniques in conjunction with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) within sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) examines new methods, such as Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution, Simple Weight Calculation, and the...
E. Boz, Ahmet Çalık, Abdulaziz Alshalfan et al.· Decision Making Advances· 1 citation
GenAI's current business value is concentrated in augmenting, rather than automating, decision-making, with the strongest evidence for productivity gains among relatively lower-skilled or lower-performing decision-makers, and the mapping of AI capability boundaries within specific decision domains as the central future...
Rajidi Rammohan Reddy, V. Thumar, Amar Jyoti Borah et al.· International journal of com...· 0 citations
This systematic review examines how artificial intelligence can support strategic decision-making in private universities, the organizational conditions shaping its value, and the governance and implementation risks that constrain responsible use and identifies four interconnected roles of AI: environmental intelligenc...
Yun-Dong Wu, Wei-Jian Kong· Artificial Intelligence in E...· 0 citations
The article examines the potential of artificial intelligence to optimize management processes and improve decision-making in large organizations and proposes a conceptual AI-based management framework that integrates data sources, analytical models, and decision support systems into a unified adaptive cycle with a fee...
Serhii Kubitskyi, Y. Kozlovskyi, K. Balabukha et al.· Human Resources Management a...· 0 citations
A formal human-AI Collaborative Problem-Solving (HACPS) model is presented, which proposes and empirically tests five falsifiable and explicit statistical hypotheses for task partitioning of decision sub-tasks between human and machine agents based on their comparative strengths.
E. Abegunde· International Journal For Mu...· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 30, 2026
MIT professors Adam Berinsky and Chara Podimata discuss a new project to track how AI chatbots are responding to questions about the 2026 U.S. midterm elections.
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comOct 30, 2026
Evaluating Microsoft Copilot at enterprise scale requires test data that captures the full complexity of real organizations, yet real enterprise data contains sensitive information that cannot be used for evaluation under any circumstances. The post From synthetic enterprise data evaluations to real Microsoft Copilot AI confidence appeared first on Microsoft Research.
Critical flaws, compromised release channels and agentic AI threats landed within days of each other in mid-October 2026. Why “Black October” may say more about how well we now find weaknesses than about the attacks themselves. The post Black October? The Week AI Changed the Cybersecurity Conversation appeared first on GPT-Lab.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.