Skip to content
#federated learning Open access

Trustworthy and privacy-preserving decentralized federated learning with multi-layer defense for secure collaborative AI

Sep 2026 · Discover Artificial Intelligence · Vol 6 · 0 citations · 24 references
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Abstract

Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) enables collaborative artificial intelligence model training without centralizing sensitive data, making it suitable for privacy-critical and distributed intelligent systems such as healthcare, Industrial IoT, and smart digital infrastructure. Despite its advantages, DFL remains vulnerable to privacy leakage through shared model updates and to model poisoning and backdoor attacks that compromise system reliability, robustness, and trustworthiness. Existing defense mechanisms primarily address either privacy preservation or poisoning robustness independently and often exhibit limited effectiveness under adaptive or high-ratio adversarial settings. This work proposes a trustworthy and privacy-preserving decentralized federated learning framework that jointly addresses these challenges through two integrated components: (i) a hybrid privacy mechanism based on public dataset pretraining followed by differentially private fine-tuning, and (ii) a multi-layer model defense architecture designed to mitigate poisoning and backdoor attacks across decentralized peer-to-peer environments. The framework integrates local data sanitization, peer-side model verification, robust trimmed-mean aggregation, and runtime inference protection to provide defense-in-depth across both training-time and inference-time attack surfaces. An adversary model and operational assumptions are formally defined, and the framework is evaluated under strong adversarial conditions, including a 20% poisoning ratio. Experimental results demonstrate consistent robustness improvements over a vanilla DFL baseline. While the baseline model achieves a clean accuracy of 83.10%, the proposed framework improves clean performance to 86.12%. Under adversarial conditions, accuracy improves from 37.71% to 53.88% for Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) attacks, from 21.75% to 46.40% for Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) attacks, and from 40.62% to 67.35% for Carlini–Wagner (CW) attacks. For backdoor-based poisoning attacks such as BadNets and Blended attacks, the defense pipeline restores model accuracy to above 86% while maintaining stable benign performance. These findings demonstrate that the proposed framework provides an effective balance between privacy preservation, adversarial robustness, and trustworthy decentralized collaborative learning for secure AI-driven systems.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.