A sharp lower bound is proved for smooth nonconvex stochastic optimization with uniformly bounded gradient noise with uniformly bounded gradient noise and resolves the question raised by whether almost-surely bounded oracle error permits a better rate than bounded variance.
Abstract
We prove a sharp lower bound for smooth nonconvex stochastic optimization with uniformly bounded gradient noise. In the \(K=1\) fresh-sample model, every randomized adaptive algorithm requires $$\Omega\left( \frac{\Delta L}{\epsilon^2} + \frac{\Delta L\sigma^2}{\epsilon^4} \right)$$ queries to find a point with expected gradient norm at most \(\epsilon\). This matches the standard upper bound and, to the best of our knowledge, resolves the question raised by [Arjevani et al. 2023] of whether almost-surely bounded oracle error permits a better rate than bounded variance. The proof was independently generated with GPT-5.6 Sol in Codex's Ultra mode during a two-hour session. The human author supplied the prompt and was responsible only forchecking the proof and revising and polishing the manuscript.
This work proves the first near-optimal lower bound for arbitrary adaptive randomized algorithms throughout both accuracy regimes of exact value Lipschitz convex optimization, and develops a posterior mean energy method for adaptive exact max observations.
Haihan Zhang, Chen-Heng Zhang, Zhiquan Qi et al.· 1 citation
It is proved that every deterministic first-order algorithm requires a first-order oracle that returns both the function value and the full subdifferential at every query point, and establishes the optimal deterministic oracle complexity.
It is proved that every deterministic first-order method requires $\Omega(\ell\Delta\kappa/\epsilon^2)$ oracle queries in the worst case to find $x$ satisfying $\Phi(0)-\inf_x\Phi(x)$ and that the linear dependence on $\kappa$ is unavoidable for deterministic first-order methods.
A variant of stochastic gradient descent with initial regularization with initial regularization is analyzed and dimension-free upper bounds on its expected excess risk for the squared loss are derived.
A lower bound of $\Omega(\,\frac{d^2}{\log(d+1)})$ on the oracle complexity in this setting is provided, to close this gap dating back to 1996, up to polylogarithmic factors.
A variant of the cubic-regularized Newton method for nonconvex optimization that is parameter-free in that it requires no prior knowledge of problem-dependent parameters is analyzed, and an oracle complexity bound is derived for finding an $(varepsilon, \delta)-second-order stationary point.