It is suggested that reliable inference-time adaptation requires not only better proposals, but also a principled mechanism for deciding which updates should become part of the deployed system.
Abstract
Video world models are increasingly used as simulators for planning and embodied decision making, yet improving them at inference time introduces a subtle evaluation problem: prompts, samplers, verifiers, and selectors may evolve together, making it difficult to attribute gains or prevent held-out feedback from shaping the final policy. We introduce \scope (\emph{\scopefullname}), a framework for auditable inference-time adaptation of frozen video world models. \scope represents external controls as a typed state, updates this state only through bounded changes supported by development evidence, and freezes the resulting policy before held-out evaluation. On Physics-IQ benchmark, \scope improves over the exact frozen base by $+14.24$ (95\% CI $[+8.10,+21.23]$). Controlled ablations further identify gains from scene specification, sampling, and learned selection, while the margin over the strongest matched agentic baseline remains unresolved. Cross-backbone and prospective evaluations reveal a complementary result: useful inference-time updates exist, but their benefits do not transfer uniformly across models and settings. Together, these findings suggest that reliable inference-time adaptation requires not only better proposals, but also a principled mechanism for deciding which updates should become part of the deployed system. Code is available at https://github.com/YuhuaJiang2002/SCOPE.
Long-video agents can actively gather question-relevant evidence, but they typically leave a central decision implicit: when has the agent seen enough to answer? We propose CASE, a plug-in termination framework that frames this decision as policy-conditioned sequential stopping. At each causal checkpoint, CASE combines...
Yi-Ming Du, Cheng-Hao Liu, Zhiyuan Liu et al.· 0 citations
Repository-scale code optimization demands broad diagnosis, but unconstrained agent edits impede review and attribution. We present MACO-AI, a reusable multi-agent optimization skill that restricts source changes to annotations and intrinsics. Before delegation, initialization freezes the source state and measurement c...
Jun-Yu Liu, Zong-Yan Xian· Proceedings of the 41st IEEE...· 0 citations
FIND is introduced, an agentic real-world RL framework that closes the loop between scene understanding, weakness-aware practice, self-evaluation, and policy improvement in a persistent workspace and reframes autonomous practice as a scene-conditioned, performance-aware task-selection problem.
Yuan Fang, Ze-Chu Li, Hao-Lei Tong et al.· 2 citations
CodeActionBench is introduced, a benchmark of 25 manipulation tasks that evaluates this capability through agentic Code-as-Policy and provides a controlled testbed for measuring how general-purpose models translate their capabilities into manipulation behavior and for examining typical failure scenarios in that process...
Yiheng Lyu, Xueying Jiang, Wen-Hao Li et al.· 2 citations
Across 30 RoboDojo tasks, using zero shot for Open and one demonstration elsewhere, RoboICL improves on official zero-shot \gptastra{} by 20--27 progress-score points in every category, and leads the leaderboard baselines on Memory and Open, achieves comparable performance to the strongest Precision baseline, and remai...
World-model planners typically scale outward by rolling farther, sampling more trajectories, or optimizing longer, while assigning the same computation to every imagined transition. We show that making every transition uniformly deeper wastes computation and can degrade planning because useful refinement is concentrate...
Zi-Jian Jin, Yun-Bei Zhang, Yuan-Zhe Liu et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.