A structured narrative review using predefined searches of Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus to synthesize empirical XAI applications across six water-research domains, with emphasis on method selection, model and data compatibility, explanation reliability, and operational implementation.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in water research. However, many AI models, particularly complex machine learning models, often generate outcomes that are difficult for humans to interpret. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has been developed to address these challenges by providing transparent and human-interpretable explanations of model behavior and predictions. We conducted a structured narrative review using predefined searches of Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus to synthesize empirical XAI applications across six water-research domains: hydrological processes, water quality and pollution, groundwater systems, urban water systems, climate–water interactions, and water and wastewater treatment. The review covers feature-importance methods, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), partial dependence plots (PDPs), individual conditional expectation (ICE) plots, accumulated local effects (ALE) plots, counterfactual explanations, and deep-learning attribution methods. Building on previous reviews and perspectives focused on particular water domains or methodological priorities, we provide a cross-domain synthesis of XAI spanning natural and engineered water systems, with emphasis on method selection, model and data compatibility, explanation reliability, and operational implementation. These capabilities, however, must be interpreted with appropriate caution because XAI explanations remain conditional on the data, fitted model, and explanation method, and therefore should not be treated as evidence of causal mechanisms or environmental controls. Recognizing these limitations, we provide practical guidance for selecting and evaluating XAI methods and outline priorities for developing reliable, scalable, and operationally useful AI systems for water research and management.
It is concluded that explainability is a necessary, though not sufficient, condition for trustworthy Al, and concrete directions for future research are outlined, including standardised benchmarks, human-centred evaluation, and explainability for large generative models.
Afna Ashraff M, Archana K, Buthaina Buthaina et al.· International Journal of Tec...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI), explainable AI (XAI), digital twins, and intelligent decision-support systems are increasingly proposed for water management, yet existing reviews usually emphasize algorithms or architectures rather than the evidence chain from prediction to governed decisions and measured outcomes. This...
This work investigates LLM-based forecasting agents, meaning systems in which a language model contributes to a scored prediction about a future or currently unobserved target, and organizes architectures into three groups.
Xiao-Gang Xu, Jiaqi Tang, Jianmin Chen et al.· 0 citations
This study critically investigates the evolving role of artificial intelligence (AI) in financial forecasting through a systematic literature review conducted across multiple reputable academic databases, and identifies persistent limitations, including model opacity, data quality concerns, and compliance challenges.
Wasiu Eyinade· World Journal of Finance and...· 0 citations
Understanding the main drivers of water demand predictive models is important for model applications and usability. The ever-increasing computational capacity has enabled multiple complex models to excel at predicting demand values. However, the understanding of how the model works and what predictors are responsible...
Angela Maldonado Alfaro, Carly Boyer, Jorge E. Pesantez· Journal of water resources p...· 0 citations
Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming computational biology. However, closer scrutiny reveals that many reported results do not hold under rigorous evaluation. This paper identifies prevalent, recurring issues in the field, including narrow datasets, hidden confounders that make supposedly indep...
T. Khang, Joshua W. K. Ho, Lin Hou et al.· Quantitative Biology· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 30, 2026
MIT professors Adam Berinsky and Chara Podimata discuss a new project to track how AI chatbots are responding to questions about the 2026 U.S. midterm elections.
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comOct 30, 2026
Evaluating Microsoft Copilot at enterprise scale requires test data that captures the full complexity of real organizations, yet real enterprise data contains sensitive information that cannot be used for evaluation under any circumstances. The post From synthetic enterprise data evaluations to real Microsoft Copilot AI confidence appeared first on Microsoft Research.
Critical flaws, compromised release channels and agentic AI threats landed within days of each other in mid-October 2026. Why “Black October” may say more about how well we now find weaknesses than about the attacks themselves. The post Black October? The Week AI Changed the Cybersecurity Conversation appeared first on GPT-Lab.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.