Skip to content
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access

RULER: Representation-Level Verification of Machine Unlearning

Georgina Cosma Axel Finke
Aug 2026
Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Machine unlearning aims to remove the influence of specific training records from a deployed model without retraining from scratch. Current protocols verify this at the output level through membership inference, retain accuracy, and forget-set accuracy, but a model can satisfy all three whilst still encoding forgotten records in its intermediate representations. We introduce RULER, a set of representation-level verification metrics. The oracle-comparative metric M2 measures whether forget-set records occupy the same representational position as in a model retrained without them. The oracle-free metric M4 detects residuals from the unlearned model's internal similarity structure alone, without retraining. Four approximate unlearning methods all pass output-level evaluation, yet under a linear mixed-effects model M2 detects significant residuals in 10 of 12 conditions (p<0.05), with effect sizes growing as the forget fraction increases. A fifth method, Bad Teacher, shows the same residuals despite a different forgetting mechanism. M4 acts as a pre-unlearning diagnostic across tabular, image, clinical text, and face-identity settings: it detects identity-level memorisation in face recognition models where no tested method fully erases the signal.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Review Dec 2025

Professional Software Developers Don't Vibe, They Control: AI Agent Use for Coding in 2025

Investigating how experienced developers use agents in building software, including their motivations, strategies, task suitability, and sentiments finds that while experienced developers value agents as a productivity boost, they retain their agency in software design and implementation out of insistence on fundamental software quality attributes.

Ruanqianqian Huang, Avery Reyna, Sorin Lerner et al. · 19 citations · ⚡1
#artificial intelligence Review Open access Jan 2026

A systematic review of machine learning techniques to address diagnosis and treatment of autism: challenges and opportunities

This systematic review evaluates 55 studies from 2017 to 2023 on the application of machine learning techniques to ASD, highlighting key challenges and opportunities, particularly the need for models that can integrate complex data to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes.

Rafael Muñoz-Terol, Jesús Peral, Sandra Amador et al. · 4 citations · ⚡1

Convergent Evolution: How Different Language Models Learn Similar Number Representations

This paper identifies two different routes through which models can acquire geometrically separable features: they can learn them from complementary co-occurrence signals in general language data, including text-number co-occurrence and cross-number interaction, or from multi-token addition problems.

Deqing Fu, Tianyi Zhou, Mikhail Belkin et al. · 3 citations
#artificial intelligence Open access Feb 2025

Iterative Flow Matching - Path Correction and Gradual Refinement for Enhanced Generative Modeling

This work explores image generation using flow matching using flow matching and proposes an iterative process that can be integrated into virtually any generative modeling technique, thereby enhancing the performance and robustness of image synthesis systems.

Eldad Haber, Shadab Ahamed, Md Shahriar Rahim Siddiqui et al. · 3 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Apr 2026

AutoOR: Scalably Post-training LLMs to Autoformulate Operations Research Problems

This work presents AutoOR, a scalable synthetic data generation and reinforcement learning pipeline that trains LLMs to autoformulate optimization problems specified in natural language across linear, mixed-integer, and non-linear categories and introduces a curriculum RL strategy that bootstraps from limited initial training data to make this class tractable for post-training.

S. Motwani, Chuan Du, A. Petrov et al. · 2 citations

When Audio-Language Models Fail to Leverage Multimodal Context for Dysarthric Speech Recognition

A benchmark built on the Speech Accessibility Project (SAP) dataset is introduced that tests whether diagnosis labels, clinician-derived speech ratings, and progressively richer clinical descriptions improve transcription accuracy for dysarthric speech, finding that current models do not meaningfully use this context.

P. Moure, Niclas Pokel, Bilal Bounajma et al. · 2 citations

Related blog posts