Skip to content
#explainable ai Review Open access

Artificial intelligence in physical and rehabilitation medicine: first update of the living systematic mapping review up to May 31st, 2025.

Sep 2026 · European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

Literary trends of the update of the living systematic mapping review REHALISE up to May 31st, 2025, suggest a slight and gradual shift toward more clinically oriented applications, though robustness and reproducibility remain critical concerns.

Abstract

Background

Artificial intelligence is increasingly applied to rehabilitation; however, persisting gaps in research, such as methodological heterogeneity, poor reporting, and lack of validation, reduce clinical translation. Living systematic reviews offer a dynamic approach to continuously monitor evolving evidence. The aim of this first update up to May 31st, 2025 is to expand current evidence base, identifying emerging trends and persistent gaps.

Methods

A total of 784 studies were screened, and 95 new studies were included, for a cumulative total of 335 studies across the first release and the update up to May 31st, 2025.

Results

In this update up to May 31st, 2025, 95 new studies were included, bringing the cumulative dataset to 335 studies. A strong recent growth in publications was observed, with China and the USA as the main contributors. There is an increase in the clinical-oriented use of AI. Of note, there is a slight increase in the adoption of reporting guidelines. Methodological limitations persisted, particularly a lack of adoption of reporting tools dedicated to and validated for AI. Explainability remains inconsistently described and applied (28.4%) with a growth trend (+18.2%); and external validation is infrequent (13.7%). Although randomized controlled trials showed a slight increase, they remain underrepresented overall, a finding consistent with the OCEBM distribution, which is still predominantly weighted toward lower-to-moderate levels of evidence (Level 3-4). This highlights persistent gaps in high-quality evidence.

Conclusions

Literature trends of the update of the living systematic mapping review REHALISE up to May 31st, 2025, compared to the first release, suggest a slight and gradual shift toward more clinically oriented applications, though robustness and reproducibility remain critical concerns.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology: An Evidence Map Across Subspecialties, 2014–2026

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being applied in healthcare, including cardiology, with growing interest in its potential to support diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical decision-making. The rapid pace of technological advancements is not matched by equivalent progress in the regulation and appraisal of th...

Łukasz Kołtowski, M. Basza, M. Soliński et al. · 0 citations
#small language model Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedics: Global Research Trends and Emerging Applications.

Keyword mapping demonstrated three co-dominant hubs centered on artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning, while co-citation analysis identified foundational clusters rooted largely in computer science methodology.

Lillian Bosh, Pranay Gadikota, Omar Viswanath et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Mental Healthcare: A Critical Narrative Review of Diagnosis, Treatment Personalisation and Patient Monitoring

This critical narrative review examines evidence across the three domains in which artificial intelligence has been most extensively applied to mental health, namely diagnostic classification and risk detection, treatment personalisation, and continuous patient monitoring, and asks why demonstrated technical performanc...

Oyebode Mary Oluwabunmi, Anyebe Daniel Ameh, Jacob Miracle Godswill et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Rehabilitation: A Systematic Mapping Review

Background: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly entering rehabilitation, but the maturity and functional distribution of the evidence remain unclear. Methods: We conducted a mapping review reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR as applicable. PubMed and Scopus were searched using controlled vocabulary...

D. Coraci, Gianluca Regazzo, G. Santilli et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Artificial intelligence and digital technologies transforming neonatal respiratory assessment: a scoping review.

Digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) have been increasingly incorporated into neonatal care, particularly in respiratory assessment. However, structured evidence regarding their clinical applications, performance, and limitations remains limited. This scoping review analyzed 35 studies published betwee...

S. Ribeiro, Maria Eduarda Ribeiro Rocha Vargas, Raquel de Carvalho Velame et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

An Umbrella Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Mental Health Care.

Artificial intelligence has significant potential to enhance mental health nursing by supporting early identification of symptoms, improving access to care and strengthening clinical decision-making, with stronger evidence observed in reviews evaluating AI interventions for early detection and risk prediction.

J. Odame, Gabriel Obeng-Gyamfi, Dayeon Heo et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 30, 2026

Q&A: Hey AI, who should I vote for this year?

MIT professors Adam Berinsky and Chara Podimata discuss a new project to track how AI chatbots are responding to questions about the 2026 U.S. midterm elections.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.