Skip to content

The Civist Manifesto: A Political-Economic Framework for the Labor-Optional Era Spanish and French version

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

Spanish and French version The Civist Manifesto proposes Civism as a political-economic framework for the Labor-Optional Era: a period in which artificial intelligence, robotics, and autonomous production may progressively reduce the necessity of human labor for economic survival. Civism does not seek to abolish capitalism, private property, markets, entrepreneurship, or individual economic freedom. Instead, it proposes a new ownership architecture for increasingly autonomous productive capacity. The framework is built around three economic layers: the Human Commons, the Competitive Economy, and the Civilization Capital Layer. At its center is the Citizen Production Fund (CPF), through which citizens collectively own a portion of systemically important automated productive infrastructure and receive returns from that ownership. Civism's central constitutional principle is: Economic inequality is permissible; political inequality is not. The manifesto also proposes an Abundance Test for determining when goods and services may move from market allocation toward universal access, together with constitutional safeguards intended to preserve human political sovereignty in an increasingly AI-driven civilization. This document is presented as a working proposal rather than a finished doctrine. Its economic assumptions, institutional mechanisms, quantitative models, and constitutional structures are intended to be subjected to criticism, empirical testing, peer review, and future revision. Version 1.5 — August 17, 2026

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations of such models.

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8

PRISM: Self-Pruning Intrinsic Selection Method for Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection

Empirically, PRISM reduces the end-to-end time for data selection and model tuning to just 30% of conventional pipelines, and achieves this efficiency while simultaneously enhancing performance, surpassing models fine-tuned on the full dataset across eight multimodal and three language understanding benchmarks.

Jinhe Bi, Yifan Wang, Danqi Yan et al. · 73 citations · ⚡4
#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Apr 2020

ECCOLA - a Method for Implementing Ethically Aligned AI Systems

The method, ECCOLA, is presented, which aims at making the high-level AI ethics principles more practical, making it possible for developers to more easily implement them in practice.

Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, P. Abrahamsson · 64 citations · ⚡6

Let the Flows Tell: Solving Graph Combinatorial Optimization Problems with GFlowNets

This paper designs Markov decision processes (MDPs) for different combinatorial problems and proposes to train conditional GFlowNets to sample from the solution space and demonstrates that GFlowNet policies can efficiently find high-quality solutions.

Dinghuai Zhang, H. Dai, Esmeralda S. Whitammer et al. · 59 citations · ⚡8

Ethically Aligned Design of Autonomous Systems: Industry viewpoint and an empirical study

An empirical study on the current state of practice in artificial intelligence ethics is conducted by means of a multiple case study of five case companies, which indicates a gap between research and practice in the area.

Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, Joni Kultanen et al. · 56 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.