Jun 2026· Pediatric Investigation· 0 citations· 88 references
Medicine
TL;DR
AI shows promise for pediatric NDD care, but equitable clinical adoption will require inclusive research, external validation, and equity‐focused implementation, with particular attention to equity considerations.
Abstract
ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in healthcare and has the potential to improve the diagnosis, treatment, monitoring, and management of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) in children. Early identification and personalized care are often constrained by subjective assessment and inequitable access. AI tools may enhance diagnostic accuracy and care delivery; however, the maturity, clinical readiness, and equity implications of this evidence base remain unclear. This scoping review mapped peer‐reviewed studies published in English since 2015 that described empirical or conceptual AI applications for diagnosis, monitoring, decision support, or treatment in pediatric NDD care, with particular attention to equity considerations. From 1027 records, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most focused on attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD, n = 7), autism spectrum disorder (ASD, n = 4), with predominating diagnostic tools. Reported accuracies ranged from 76% to 100% for ADHD and from 88% to 95% for ASD. Most studies were preliminary or in early implementations, with only one externally validated. Equity considerations were limited, with overrepresentation of White males and little attention paid to socioeconomic or cultural factors. AI shows promise for pediatric NDD care, but equitable clinical adoption will require inclusive research, external validation, and equity‐focused implementation.
It is argued that AI’s most important contribution to autism care is unlikely to lie in marginal improvements in classification accuracy alone, and its potential value lies in expanding access, supporting task-sharing, shortening diagnostic pathways, enabling population-oriented screening, and reaching under-recognised...
Xugao Han, Lingyan Weng, Houxi Xu· Frontiers in Public Health· 0 citations
The results suggest that the use of AI to detect ASD is not yet ready for clinical use, and transparent reporting of validation, independent external cohorts, diverse datasets, and prospective testing of positive predictive value in realistic population prevalence should be the focus of future research.
Shivani Pant, A. Gehlot, Neha Singh et al.· International Journal for Gl...· 0 citations
These technologies show promise in reducing human error and enhancing mental health care delivery; however, persistent challenges include data privacy, ethical considerations, and the need for diverse, large-scale datasets.
Juster Donal Sinaga· Journal of Society Counselin...· 0 citations
A comprehensive review of recent advancements in ASD research, with particular emphasis on neuroimaging, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning (ML)-based diagnostic approaches, highlights the growing potential of AI-driven tools for supporting early ASD diagnosis and emphasizes the need for standardized pr...
Kuljeet Singh, Khushi Mogha, S. Moctar· Neurological Sciences· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence shows promise as a supportive tool for early screening, but current evidence supports its use as a complement to, rather than replacement for, clinical assessment.
Andrea Catalina Mahecha Ballesteros, Juanita Valeria García Bello, Eleaine Scarlet González Zuñiga et al.· Current Psychiatry Reports· 0 citations
Based on the findings, AI seems highly promising for patient-specific ASD therapy via proactive, data-driven scaffolding, but more RCTs and crucial augmentation of representation gaps concerning adult and female ASD phenotype studies are required.
Julia Kuca, Magdalena Stencel, Błażej Pilarski et al.· Frontiers in Psychiatry· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.