Back to #artificial intelligence
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access

Pre-Compiled Pipeline Shards for Distributed LLM Inference on Intel AI PC Fleets

Tate Berenbaum Muthaiah Venkatachalam
Aug 2026
Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Modern Intel AI PCs ship capable integrated GPUs and NPUs with 16+ GB of unified memory, and they spend considerable time idle. That is not enough memory to fit a large model such as a 70B-parameter LLM. We show that a handful of AIPCs, working together over an ordinary network, can serve models beyond the capability of any single one. We use pipeline parallelism: a model is split by layer into per-stage shards, each pre-compiled into an OpenVINO graph, so that every machine runs one shard and passes activations to the next. Three techniques make this fast enough to be useful. First, we recover the speed of the unsplit model: a naive per-stage export runs well below monolithic inference because it misses an OpenVINO GPU optimization, and injecting a beam_idx Gather into each shard triggers that optimization (the IndirectKVCache fusion) and brings the shards to parity. Second, we leverage speculative decoding on stateful OpenVINO models. Third, the pipeline serves several users at once by interleaving their requests across the stages, each request carrying its own cache (micro-batching). Together, a two-node Llama 3.1 8B INT4 pipeline serves two concurrent users at 1.79x the single-user throughput of the unsplit model on the same hardware, and the gap widens under simulated wide-area latency. The same design scales to a 70B model that no single fleet member can hold: a four-node deployment of Lunar Lake AI PCs on Intel Tiber Cloud serves a single user at interactive speed, with output token-for-token identical to the same four-node pipeline decoding without speculation. Code, raw benchmark logs, and reproduction scripts ship as a self-contained package at https://github.com/labscommunity/pipeline-sharded-inference-paper (in the top-level reproduction/ directory).

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Review Dec 2025

Professional Software Developers Don't Vibe, They Control: AI Agent Use for Coding in 2025

Investigating how experienced developers use agents in building software, including their motivations, strategies, task suitability, and sentiments finds that while experienced developers value agents as a productivity boost, they retain their agency in software design and implementation out of insistence on fundamental software quality attributes.

Ruanqianqian Huang, Avery Reyna, Sorin Lerner et al. · 19 citations · ⚡1
#artificial intelligence Review Open access Jan 2026

A systematic review of machine learning techniques to address diagnosis and treatment of autism: challenges and opportunities

This systematic review evaluates 55 studies from 2017 to 2023 on the application of machine learning techniques to ASD, highlighting key challenges and opportunities, particularly the need for models that can integrate complex data to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes.

Rafael Muñoz-Terol, Jesús Peral, Sandra Amador et al. · 4 citations · ⚡1

Convergent Evolution: How Different Language Models Learn Similar Number Representations

This paper identifies two different routes through which models can acquire geometrically separable features: they can learn them from complementary co-occurrence signals in general language data, including text-number co-occurrence and cross-number interaction, or from multi-token addition problems.

Deqing Fu, Tianyi Zhou, Mikhail Belkin et al. · 3 citations
#artificial intelligence Open access May 2025

TabularQGAN: a quantum generative model for tabular data synthesis

A novel quantum generative model for synthesizing tabular data by proposing a quantum generative adversarial network architecture with flexible data encoding and a novel quantum circuit ansatz for effectively modeling tabular data is introduced.

P. Bhardwaj, Caitlin Jones, Lasse Dierich et al. · 2 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Jun 2026

Self-Evolving Agents as Dynamic Graph Transformation: A Survey and New Perspective

This survey model agent state as a dynamic graph, where memories, tools, skills, workflows, and inter-agent relations are represented as typed nodes, edges, and subgraphs updated through schema-constrained rewrites to provide a compact structural lens for designing and governing self-evolving agents.

Yuanyuan Xu, Wenjie Zhang, Yin Chen et al. · 2 citations

Related blog posts