Skip to content
#artificial intelligence #generative ai Conference Open access

Beyond “Made with AI”: Visualizing Provenance Density to Mitigate the Transparency Penalty

Sep 2026 · Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · pp. 7712-7720 · 0 citations · 44 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Provenance Density is proposed, an evidence-visualization interface that shows the density of verified claims in a text that produced a large discernment gap between truth and fabrication in a user study.

Abstract

As generative AI makes polished prose cheap to produce, users can no longer rely on fluency as a proxy for truth. We call this failure mode the Fluency Trap: users trust fluent hallucinations while also discounting accurate content once it is disclosed as AI-generated. Binary "Made with AI" labels respond with authorship disclosure, but they do not show what supports a claim. We propose Provenance Density, an evidence-visualization interface that shows the density of verified claims in a text. In a user study with 81 participants, an idealized Provenance Density interface produced a large discernment gap between truth and fabrication (+4.15 points, d=1.82), whereas participants given no signal showed no detectable discrimination. A technical audit with 200 samples shows that retrieval density alone is insufficient; unexpectedly, the Consistency Veto carries most of the discriminative signal on dynamic queries. As AI-generated content becomes indistinguishable from human writing, effective transparency must move from authorship disclosure toward evidence visualization.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Who Wrote It Is Not Enough: Detecting Who Contributed the Insight

As LLMs increasingly assist scientific writing and peer review, detecting who wrote the text is no longer sufficient: we need to determine who contributed the underlying insight. We introduce Insight Provenance, the task of identifying whether a review insight originates from a human, an LLM, or their hybrid contributi...

Zhuo-Yang Zou, Abolfazl Ansari, Jia-Xi Yang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

When Form Intersects with Automation: Ethics, Authorship, and the Future of IMRAD.

Academic dishonesty predates artificial intelligence; fabrication, plagiarism, and ghost authorship largely reflect distorted "publish or perish" incentives rather than technological novelty. We argue that using AI to assist with drafting, linguistic editing, and organizing text, tables, and figures in biology is ethic...

Vasco Azevedo · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Beyond Provenance: The Economics and Governance of Personalized AI Memory

Personalized AI memories, defined as persistent decision-relevant states distilled by platforms from long-run human-AI interaction, are increasingly portable, provenance-certifiable, and tradable. Provenance answers the question of origin, but it does not settle who holds which rights over a memory, nor how wider deplo...

Jian'an Chen, Yu-Fei Qin, Yao-Sen Lin · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.