Jun 2026· Economics Ecology Socium· Vol 10, pp. 81-93· 0 citations· 36 references
TL;DR
These insights demonstrate that successful public sector AI governance requires moving beyond mere regulatory compliance to embrace targeted capacity-building, institutional learning, and well-defined national implementation strategies, and introduce a holistic framework for the sustainable governance of AI systems.
Abstract
Background. To successfully modernise public governance for the digital era, the strategic adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) is an absolute necessity. The AI, however, cannot deliver sustainable value in a vacuum. Unlocking its true potential depends on institutional readiness, proactive regulatory frameworks, and robust governance capacity to mitigate both operational and societal risks.
Purpose. This study aims to examine how the evolving EU AI Act’s governance framework shapes the concept of Sustainable Digital Governance and to evaluate AI literacy and institutional readiness among Croatian civil servants as critical prerequisites for responsible AI deployment.
Findings. This empirical study utilises survey data collected in mid-2025 from Croatian civil servants to evaluate AI literacy, perceptions, and organisational readiness. While these preliminary findings are subject to certain methodological limitations, they reveal a severe implementation gap between regulatory mandates and institutional capacity. 73.6% of surveyed officials reported no prior exposure to AI-related training or professional discourse, and 80.2% could not identify high-risk AI systems within their operational environments. 62.6% noted a lack of organisational guidance on AI software utilities and their associated risks, leaving only 25.3% who felt capable of executing tasks in compliance with AI Act risk-mitigation standards.
Implications. These insights demonstrate that successful public sector AI governance requires moving beyond mere regulatory compliance to embrace targeted capacity-building, institutional learning, and well-defined national implementation strategies. Ultimately, this study synthesises theoretical perspectives with empirical data to introduce a holistic framework for the sustainable governance of AI systems. It concludes with actionable recommendations designed to guide policymakers and organisational leaders through the regulatory and operational complexities of an AI-driven landscape.
An academic adaptation of Patrick Rudolf Dannacher's presentation at the 10th Jakarta Geopolitical Forum 2026 is presented, examining Indonesia's strategic position in the evolving global AI landscape.
Patrick Rudolf Dannacher Dannacher· Proceeding Jakarta Geopoliti...· 1 citation
The study offers the Inclusive AI Governance-Readiness Framework, connecting institutional coordination, stakeholder engagement, readiness, and ethics for sustainable AI integration.
Doha Baladi, B. Guennoun· Journal of Interdisciplinary...· 0 citations
Applied to African AI governance domains, this framework reveals how institutional fragmentation, infrastructural dependency, and global platform dominance undermine state-centred regulatory models.
Chijioke I. Okorie· Potchefstroom Electronic Law...· 0 citations
The function of AI in the field of sustainable governance is discussed and global publication trends, thematic interests, and collaborative patterns from 2000 to 2019 are examined and underscores the importance of concerted interdisciplinary research efforts to strengthen the resilience, trust, and transparency of gove...
Empirical evidence is provided for the high relevance of procurement for public sector AI services via supplier-related governance perspectives and for the need to refine existing AI readiness and adoption models, particularly for regulated or defense-related procurement environments.
Max Ernst Hamscher, A. Glas, Michael Essig· International Journal of Pub...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.