This study develops a six-phase human-centred governance framework for responsible AI adoption through an integrative synthesis of academic literature, international standards, and regulatory frameworks, including the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, ISO/IEC 42001, and the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming organisational operations and strategic decision-making, but its rapid adoption has outpaced the development of governance mechanisms capable of supporting sustainable growth and societal outcomes. Organisations face increasing challenges in translating ethical principles and regulatory requirements into actionable governance processes that align with business strategy and stakeholder expectations. This study develops a six-phase human-centred governance framework for responsible AI adoption through an integrative synthesis of academic literature, international standards, and regulatory frameworks, including the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, ISO/IEC 42001, and the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act. The proposed framework integrates strategic alignment, risk management, governance-by-design, organisational capability, continuous monitoring, and legal assurance into a structured and repeatable model. By positioning AI governance as a strategic capability rather than a compliance function, the framework provides a practical roadmap for organisations to embed responsible AI practices that enhance transparency, accountability, and trust. The study contributes to the field of human factors in business management by demonstrating how governance can enable sustainable organisational performance while supporting broader societal impact.
It is argued that AI adoption should be understood not merely as automation but as a technology-transfer problem, and the AITTF is introduced, a seven-stage governance model designed to help organisations transfer workflows, expertise and decision-making into AI-enabled systems while maintaining accountability, operati...
This paper explores how AI risk governance can be effectively integrated into the epistemological and structural foundations of such organizations through the lens of fourth-order cybernetics, and offers a conceptual pathway for resilient and ethically aligned AI implementation in complex organizational environments.
Ludmila Jiříčková, Petr Doucek· International Scientific Con...· 0 citations
This article examines three interconnected dimensions of responsible AI for enterprise modernization: governance infrastructure for accountable AI deployment, algorithmic equity in high-impact decision environments, and the evolving international regulatory landscape shaping enterprise AI governance.
M. Modi· International Journal of Eng...· 0 citations
The proposed framework offers a real-world action plan for sustainable AI transformation and a theoretical understanding of the phenomenon of AI transformation by offering a structured, risk-mitigated pathway toward high-maturity, AI-enabled enterprise operations.
M. Abuhaimed· Journal of Intelligent Decis...· 0 citations
Examining how artificial intelligence (AI) governance supports sustainable decision-making across organizational contexts in Europe reveals that governance increasingly aligns with formal frameworks through policies, dedicated structures, human oversight and Environmental, Social and Governance oriented indicators, enh...
Fernando Almeida· Journal of Ethics in Entrepr...· 0 citations
A lifecycle-oriented socio-technical governance capacity framework through a structured synthesis of public administration, digital government, decision support systems, responsible AI, socio-technical systems, sustainability, and risk governance scholarship is developed.
Cihan Necmi Günal· Sustainability· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.