Dynamic Progressive Failure and Energy-Driven Damage Evolution of Coal–Sandstone Composite Specimens Under Impact Loading: Coupling Effects of Component Ratio

Abstract

Overburden rotation and mining disturbance promote deep coal fracture and spalling, potentially inducing dynamic hazards, while the coal–rock thickness ratio largely governs the composite’s dynamic response and failure severity. Based on the geological conditions of a typical deep coal mine, SHPB tests were performed on coal–sandstone composite specimens with four systematically varied coal-to-rock ratios (C:R = 1:0, 2:1, 1:1, and 1:2). High-speed photography and the digital speckle correlation method (DIC) were integrated to capture displacement, strain, energy, and fragmentation fields throughout progressive dynamic compression. Experimental data revealed four findings: (1) Crack development follows a sequential evolution process of initiation, propagation, and failure. Higher impact air pressure accelerates crack development and coalescence, resulting in a higher degree of specimen fragmentation and fewer large blocks. Within the tested range of coal–rock ratios, an increase in the rock proportion accelerates coal fracture, which is attributed to the significantly higher density and hardness of rock compared to coal. (2) Energy evolution consistently follows three stages: absorption, accumulation, and dissipation. Under identical impact pressure, a higher rock ratio elevates equivalent stiffness and wave impedance, leading to monotonic increases in peak stress, peak strain, absorbed energy, and dissipated energy. (3) The fragmentation degree exhibits a pronounced dependence on impact pressure. Specifically, for the pure coal specimen (C:R = 1:0), when the impact pressure increases from 0.3 MPa to 0.7 MPa, the mass percentage of coarse debris (>30 mm) drops from 73.37% to 18.57%, whereas that of fine particles (<4 mm) rises from 15.69% to 35.24%. (4) Under identical impact conditions, a higher rock proportion leads to increasing trends in all measured indicators, including peak stress, strain, and energy accumulation and dissipation, which are consistent with the superior mechanical properties of the rock. Based on these observations, it can be inferred that the wave impedance mismatch and stiffness ratio at the coal–rock interface play a key role in controlling stress wave transmission/reflection and strain incompatibility; however, the individual contribution of each factor warrants further dedicated investigation.