Jul 2026· International Journal of Innovations in Science, Engineering And Management· 0 citations· 15 references
TL;DR
The review explores the key adversarial attack classes: poisoning, evasion, model extraction, model extraction, model inversion, and membership inference and also white-box, black-box, and grey-box threat models.
Abstract
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in cybersecurity has made Adversarial Machine Learning (AML) a key field of research. Though ML-based systems are more effective in intrusion detection, malware analysis, spam filtering and authentication, they are also susceptible to adversarial attacks that modify input samples, modify ML models or alter training data. The review explores the key adversarial attack classes: poisoning, evasion, model extraction, model inversion, and membership inference and also white-box, black-box, and grey-box threat models. It also provides an introduction to important defence methods like adversarial training, feature squeezing, defensive distillation, robust optimisation, detection-based methods, and ensemble learning. In addition, robustness evaluation metrics, benchmark datasets and attack assessment techniques to measure model robustness are highlighted. Lastly, the emerging trends are discussed in order to find future research directions in the field of creating trustworthy and resilient AI-based cybersecurity systems, such as Explainable AI, Federated Learning, Large Language Models, Autonomous Cyber defence, and Regulatory structures.
A detailed overview of the security risks associated with adversarial attacks is offered, including evasion attacks carried out at inference time, data poisoning that corrupts the training process, backdoor insertion that hides dormant triggers inside a model, and model inversion that leaks private information back out...
Harsh Verma· International Journal of Sci...· 1 citation
A detailed empirical assessment of targeted adversarial vulnerability and defensive behaviour in a multi-class NIDS setting is presented and the results highlight long-standing, class-specific, robustness gaps and provide insights that could be used to design more robust intrusion detection systems.
Khushnaseeb Roshan, Faraz Masood, A. Zafar et al.· Discover Computing· 1 citation
No single defense mechanism can provide complete protection against adversarial machine learning attacks, therefore, resilient AI-based cybersecurity requires a layered approach that protects data, features, models, inference processes, and the entire machine learning lifecycle.
Nwamini Bartholomew Tochukwu, C. Ezeaku-Ezeme· International journal of res...· 0 citations
Experimental results indicate that CNN-based NIDS are more vulnerable to adversarial attacks than ANN-based models, with adversarial examples successfully transferring across architectures, highlighting the critical risks associated with adversarial transferability.
Aasim Zafar, Shazra Wali, S. B. U. Haque· International Journal of Inf...· 0 citations
A conceptual layered framework for machine-learning-based security operations that integrates detection, adversarial-robustness testing, and human-analyst oversight is proposed by outlining directions for future research.
C. Thilagavathy, Saeed Mudether Saeed Taha, Krithik M. S. et al.· International Scientific Jou...· 0 citations
An extensive literature review on the adversarial attack methods, detection and defence techniques of critical network infrastructures and suggests the creation of multi-strategic, adaptive, and real-time adversarial threat management systems that can sustain themselves in a heterogeneous network environment.
F. Okoye, Aghaizu Herman Chijioke, Shamsudeen Mohammed S.B· International journal of re...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.