Skip to content
Review Open access

Psychological Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Human Cognition, Behavior, and Emotional Well-Being: A Systematic Review

2026 · International journal of research and innovation in social science · Vol 10, pp. 2352-2373 · 0 citations

TL;DR

A systematic review synthesized evidence across cognition, behavior, and emotional well-being, identifying mechanisms shaping long-term human functioning and calling for AI literacy, human-centered design, and evidence-based policy to ensure AI strengthens rather than supplants human psychological capacity.

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence across diverse contexts has generated increasing scholarly attention to its psychological consequences. Despite growing empirical literature, evidence on AI's cognitive, behavioral, and emotional impacts remains fragmented across disciplinary silos, precluding an integrated understanding. This systematic review synthesized evidence across cognition, behavior, and emotional well-being, identifying mechanisms shaping long-term human functioning. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, six databases (PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, ERIC, Google Scholar, Web of Science) were searched. Out of the 450 identified records, 57 peer-reviewed studies met inclusion criteria and were coded across 28 cognitive, behavioral, and emotional constructs. Thematic synthesis yielded three major clusters. Cluster A (n = 18): cognitive offloading, critical thinking erosion, and metacognitive atrophy were dominant, moderated by contextual and pedagogical factors. Cluster B (n = 19): AI drove adoption and learning gains but eroded agency, fostered algorithmic dependency, and produced context-sensitive trust calibration. Cluster C (n = 20): therapeutic AI reduced depressive symptoms (small-moderate effects), whereas social media AI amplified anxiety and loneliness, and companionship AI increased isolation over 12 months despite short-term comfort. AI functions as a cognitive enhancer, behavioral modifier, emotional support, and dependency mechanism, with effects moderated by design, context, user literacy, and exposure duration. Findings call for AI literacy, human-centered design, and evidence-based policy to ensure AI strengthens rather than supplants human psychological capacity.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#generative ai Review Open access Sep 2026

Emotional Reliance on Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review of AI Companionship and Mental Health Implications

Eotional reliance on AI represents an emerging clinical phenomenon with addiction-like features requiring specific diagnostic frameworks, evidence-based interventions, and ethical design guidelines and future research should prioritize longitudinal studies examining developmental impacts and neurobiological investigati...

M. Lastretti, M. Manchia, Matteo Fraschini et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Mind and Machine: Exploring the New Era of Synergetic Care through Artificial Intelligence and Emotional Intelligence

This qualitative descriptive study examined how emerging adult students training in health sciences, psychology, and social work envision the collaboration between AI/AEI tools and human clinicians, converging on a synergetic model in which AI/AEI augments, rather than replaces, clinician judgment.

F. Joseph, J. G. Bernardshaw, C. Palanisamy · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Magic and cognition: a scoping review of empirical evidence on cognitive and neural processes

Introduction Magic, understood as a set of effects designed to produce experiences of impossibility, offers a distinctive methodological potential for cognitive science because it makes it possible to manipulate, with ecological validity, processes such as attention, perception, reasoning, and memory. Despite increasin...

Miguel Modino de Lucas, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Review Open access Sep 2026

Thinking with AI or Thinking Less? A Narrative Review of Generative AI Dependence, Cognitive Offloading, and Human Cognitive Functioning

A key finding of this review is that whether GenAI is used at all is less critical than which functions are offloaded, which are maintained, and the extent to which users remain epistemically responsible for the resulting output.

Deva Adithiya L.M.D, Samarawickrema N. S., Peiris J. A. H. L. et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

How psychological trauma shapes human decision-making: a systematic literature review of cognitive, emotional, and behavioral mechanisms

sychological trauma is a public-health concern that cuts across emotional well-being and everyday decision-making. Both trauma and decision-making have been studied extensively, yet the mechanisms that connect adverse experiences to altered choice remain scattered across neuroscience, clinical psychology, and behaviora...

I. Ifdil, Nur Adila Wafiqah Zulvi, M. F. Zatrahadi · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Rethinking Cognitive Bias in Human–AI Cognitive Systems: A Structured Conceptual Mapping Review

Research in cognitive psychology has long shown that human judgment and decision making are systematically influenced by cognitive biases, particularly under conditions of uncertainty. As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become increasingly embedded in socially relevant decision making contexts—such as healthcare,...

A. C. Jacomuzzi, Brigitta Pia Alioto, Sara Magni · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.